Colloids versus crystalloids for emergency patients |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Chemistry, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Agra, India;2. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada, Legaria 694, Irrigación, Miguel Hidalgo, CDMX, Mexico;3. University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea;4. Department of Land, Water, and Environment Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang, Republic of Korea;1. School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;2. Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China;4. Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA;5. School of Computer Science, Chengdu University of Information Technology, China;6. Keya Medical, Seattle, USA;7. School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China, and Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Emergency as well as critical care nurses are often responsible for the administration and regulation of fluid resuscitation for their patients. A serious and potentially fatal decline in vital organ performance can often occur as a result of inappropriate volume management. However, emergency and/or critically ill patients who require fluid resuscitation often receive concurrent therapy and monitoring that may have equal or greater impact on the survival and therapeutic end points than does the type of fluid received. These variables have made historical comparisons of crystalloid versus colloid resuscitation difficult. The purpose of this article is to critique three articles that examine crystalloid and colloid resuscitation for patients with various disease processes. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
