Diagnostic Performance of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT and 131I-MIBG Scintigraphy in Mapping Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹³¹I-MIBG scintigraphy in the mapping of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Materials and Methods

Seventeen patients (male = 8, female = 9; age range, 13–68 years) with clinically proven or suspicious metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma were included in this prospective study. Twelve patients underwent all three modalities, whereas five patients underwent ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE and ¹³¹I-MIBG without ¹⁸F-FDG. A composite reference standard derived from anatomical and functional imaging findings, along with histopathological information, was used to validate the findings. Results were analysed on a per-patient and on per-lesion basis. Sensitivity and accuracy were assessed using McNemar’s test.

Results

On a per-patient basis, 14/17 patients were detected in ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE, 7/17 patients in ¹³¹I-MIBG, and 10/12 patients in ¹⁸F-FDG. The sensitivity and accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE, ¹³¹I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-FDG were (93.3 %, 94.1 %), (46.7 %, 52.9 %) and (90.9 %, 91.7 %) respectively. On a per-lesion basis, an overall of 472 positive lesions were detected; of which 432/472 were identified by ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE, 74/472 by ¹³¹I-MIBG, and 154/300 (patient, n = 12) by ¹⁸F-FDG. The sensitivity and accuracy of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE, ¹³¹I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-FDG were (91.5 %, 92.6 % p < 0.0001), (15.7 %, 26.0 % p < 0.0001) and (51.3 %, 57.8 % p < 0.0001) respectively. Discordant lesions were demonstrated on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE, ¹³¹I-MIBG and ¹⁸F-FDG.

Conclusions

Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT shows high diagnostic accuracy than ¹³¹I-MIBG scintigraphy and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/ CT in mapping metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.