首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Diagnostic accuracy of three scoring methods for the Davidson Trauma Scale among U.S. military Veterans
Institution:1. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Universidade Federal Fluminense (MSM-UFF), Rua Marquês do Paraná, 303-3° andar do Prédio Anexo, Niterói, RJ, Brazil;2. Institute of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB–UFRJ), Avenida Venceslau Brás, 71 fundos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;3. Department of Epidemiology and Quantitative Methods in Health, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP-FIOCRUZ), Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Abstract:Self-report questionnaires are frequently used to identify PTSD among U.S. military personnel and Veterans. Two common scoring methods used to classify PTSD include: (1) a cut score threshold and (2) endorsement of PTSD symptoms meeting DSM-IV-TR symptom cluster criteria (SCM). A third method requiring a cut score in addition to SCM has been proposed, but has received little study. The current study examined the diagnostic accuracy of three scoring methods for the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) among 804 Afghanistan and Iraq war-era military Service Members and Veterans. Data were weighted to approximate the prevalence of PTSD and other Axis I disorders in VA primary care. As expected, adding a cut score criterion to SCM improved specificity and positive predictive power. However, a cut score of 68–72 provided optimal diagnostic accuracy. The utility of the DTS, the role of baseline prevalence, and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Keywords:Posttraumatic Stress Disorder  Military Veterans  Test validity  Differential diagnosis  Sensitivity and specificity  Diagnostic efficiency
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号