首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

纯化花粉变应原免疫治疗的疗效观察
引用本文:孙秀珍,米烈汉,刘昀,冯向莉,杨昆政. 纯化花粉变应原免疫治疗的疗效观察[J]. 医学争鸣, 2006, 27(5): 466-468
作者姓名:孙秀珍  米烈汉  刘昀  冯向莉  杨昆政
作者单位:西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院呼吸科,陕西,西安,710004;陕西省中医医院呼吸科;北方医院呼吸科
摘    要:目的:观察纯化花粉(黄蒿、葎草、藜草花粉)变应原特异性免疫治疗(SIT)的疗效.方法:采取凝胶过滤方法分别提纯上述花粉变应原.采取随机、对照方法将102例确诊为季节性黄蒿、葎草、藜草花粉过敏性哮喘患者分为观察组(A组)及对照组(B组),应用纯化花粉变应原(PPA)及粗花粉变应原(CPA)分别对两组患者进行季节前SIT,疗程3 mo.临床疗效判断标准为显效、好转及无效.临床不良反应观察包括局部或全身皮疹、哮喘加重等.实验观察指标为两组SIT前后的皮肤试验(ID)风团直径、特异性IgE(sIgE)、A值均值.结果进行组内和组间比较.结果:A组SIT总有效率90%(47/52),B组78%(39/50),前者明显高于后者(P<0.05);A组仅3例轻度副反应,B组有13例(26%)出现副反应;A组及B组SIT后ID风团直径、sIgE, A值均值都较SIT前明显下降(P<0.01);A组SIT后上述指标下降程度较B组更明显(P<0.05).结论:PPA及CPA的SIT疗效均较满意,但用PPA进行SIT的安全性和疗效更好.

关 键 词:哮喘  纯化花粉变应原  免疫疗法
文章编号:1000-2790(2006)05-0466-03
收稿时间:2005-06-07
修稿时间:2005-10-10

Effect of immunotherapy with purified pollen allergens
SUN Xiu-Zhen,MI Lie-Han,LIU Yun,FENG Xiang-Li,YANG Kun-Zheng. Effect of immunotherapy with purified pollen allergens[J]. Negative, 2006, 27(5): 466-468
Authors:SUN Xiu-Zhen  MI Lie-Han  LIU Yun  FENG Xiang-Li  YANG Kun-Zheng
Abstract:AIM: To study the effect of specific immunotherapy (SIT) with purified pollen allergens (caraway, humulus and chenopodium) on asthmatic patients. METHODS: The pollen allergens were purified by gelatin filtration. One hundred and two patients with seasonal asthma allergic to caraway, humulus or chenopodium pollen were divided randomly into 2 groups: observation group (group A) and control group (group B) and the 2 groups were given purified pollen allergens (PPA) and crude pollen allergens (CPA) respectively before the allergic season. The course was 3 months. The laboratory observation included the wheals' diameter of ID, specific IgE (sIgE) and mean A value before and after SIT. RESULTS: The general effective rate of SIT with purified allergens in group A was 90% (47/52) and that with crude allergens in group B was 78% (39/50). The former was significantly higher than the latter (P<0.05). Only 3 patients in group A had slight side-effects after SIT and 13 patients (26%) in group B had side-effects. A significant decrease in the diameter of skin wheal and sIgE (P<0.01) was observed after SIT in both groups and the decrease was more significant in group A than in group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The effective rates of SIT with both PPA and CPA are satisfactory . But SIT with PPA is more effective and safer than that with CPA.
Keywords:asthma   purified pollen allergens    immunotherapy
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号