Overall survival benefits for irinotecan‐containing regimens as first‐line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: An updated meta‐analysis of ten randomized controlled trials

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still debated, and the available data on the benefit of irinotecan‐containing regimen as first‐line treatment for those patients are controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the survival benefits of irinotecan‐containing regimens in this setting. A total of 1,837 patients from ten trials were included in the analysis. Our results showed that irinotecan‐containing regimens significantly improved overall survival [OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78–0.94, p = 0.002] and progression‐free survival [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69–0.97, p = 0.026); however, the improvement of time to failure (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.77–1.04, p = 0.15), 1‐year survival rate [1‐year SR: relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97–1.24, p = 0.13] and overall response rate (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.91–1.49, p = 0.24] were nonsignificant. Equivalent frequencies of toxicities were found between the two groups excluding more Grade 3 or 4 fatigue (p = 0.001) in irinotecan‐containing regimens. This updated meta‐analysis provided strong evidence for a survival benefit of irinotecan‐containing regimen as first‐line treatment for AGC. A clear advantage of irinotecan‐containing over nonirinotecan‐containing regimen had not been established. These results should help to inform decisions about patient management and design of future trials.