首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

视网膜静脉阻塞并发黄斑水肿的眼底造影及光学相干断层扫描特点
引用本文:潘东艳,李永杰,赵世红,宋徽. 视网膜静脉阻塞并发黄斑水肿的眼底造影及光学相干断层扫描特点[J]. 第二军医大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 785-789. DOI: 10.16781/j.0258-879x.2016.06.0785
作者姓名:潘东艳  李永杰  赵世红  宋徽
作者单位:1. 第二军医大学长海医院眼科,上海,200433;2. 解放军18医院眼科,喀什,844900
基金项目:第二军医大学长海医院1255科研创新基金
摘    要:目的 分析视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)并发黄斑水肿(ME)的荧光素眼底血管造影(FA)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)特点,为RVO的ME临床诊治提供依据.方法 对75例75眼RVO患者行最佳矫正视力检查、裂隙灯、眼底镜检查、眼底彩色照相、FA、OCT检查,了解ME的FA和OCT表现类型及其对应关系,并分析FA和OCT表现类型与视力的关系.结果 75眼RVO患者中共发生ME 56眼,发生率为74.7%,ME的发生率与患者性别、年龄无关.ME常见FA 3型和OCT2型.FA 1型患者视力最佳,而OCT 4型患者视力最差.FA类型与OCT类型存在一定的对应关系,FA 1型通常表现为OCT 1型,而FA 3型通常表现为OCT 2型,FA 4型与OCT类型无确切对应关系.OCT所测黄斑中心视网膜厚度与logMAR视力呈正相关(R2 =0.322,P=0.001).结论 RVO并发的ME以囊样水肿为主.不同类型的FA和OCT以及OCT所测黄斑中心视网膜厚度与患者视力存在相关性.OCT类型与FA类型有一定对应关系,但OCT显示的囊样水肿不能区分是否缺血,治疗前需要结合FA和OCT对RVO的ME进行更精确的分类.

关 键 词:视网膜静脉阻塞  黄斑水肿  眼底造影  光学相干断层扫描
收稿时间:2015-06-01
修稿时间:2015-12-07

The characteristics of fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion
PAN Dong-yan,LI Yong-jie,ZHAO Shi-hong and SONG Hui. The characteristics of fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion[J]. Former Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University, 2016, 37(6): 785-789. DOI: 10.16781/j.0258-879x.2016.06.0785
Authors:PAN Dong-yan  LI Yong-jie  ZHAO Shi-hong  SONG Hui
Affiliation:SMMU affiliated changhai hospital,
Abstract:Objective To analyze the characteristics of fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), so as to provide evidence for the clinical management of RVO. Methods Totally 75 RVO patients (75 eyes) underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), funduscopy, fundus photography, FA and OCT examination. The correspondence between FA findings and OCT findings for ME and their relationship with BCVA were analyzed. Results It was found that ME occurred in 56 of the 75 eyes. The occurrence of ME was irrelevant to gender and age. Retinal thickness of the central fovea of macula was positively related to logMAR vision(R2=0.322,P=0.001). ME types were mostly FA type 3 and OCT type 2. The vision of FA type 1 was the best and that of OCT type 4 was the worst. There was a certain correspondence between FA type and OCT type: with OCT type 1 usually manifested as FA type 1 and OCT type 2 usually as FA type 3,and FA type 4 had no correspondence to a certain OCT type. Conclusion Cystic macular edema is the main presentation of ME secondary to RVO. Different FA types, OCT types and central fovea thickness reflect different visual acuity. There is a certain correspondence between FA types and OCT types, but OCT can not identify ischemia in cystic macular edema. A combination of FA and OCT may help to further distinguish different types of ME before treatment.
Keywords:retinal vein occlusion  macular edema  fluorescein angiography   optical coherence tomography
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《第二军医大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《第二军医大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号