Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships |
| |
Authors: | van Raalte Lisa J. Bednarchik Lori A. Generous Mark A. Mongeau Paul A. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Communication Studies, Sam Houston State University, P.O. Box 2299, Huntsville, TX, 77341, USA ;2.Hugh Downs School of Human Communication, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA ;3.Department of Communication, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA ; |
| |
Abstract: | Establishing communicative and behavioral boundaries in romantic relationships provides partners with a greater sense of relational stability and certainty. For romantic relationships, these boundaries, such as sexual exclusivity, are relatively straightforward. For casual sex relationships, however, the relational rules are less stable and certain. This exploratory study examined rules in friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) for 109 college students in the USA. Responses to open-ended questions were collected through an online questionnaire, and data were qualitatively analyzed through an inductive thematic analysis. The data were structured into communication rules, sexual rules, and relational definition rules. Results provide overlap and extension of previous work investigating rules in FWBRs. Notably, participants reported sexual exclusivity as an important rule. Additionally, potentially competing discourses in FWBR rules were best understood through the lens of relational dialectics. Findings reflect a tension in terms of relational work, as partners struggle with maintaining their sexual and friendship relationship while not falling into the “territory” of romantic relationships. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|