首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

椎弓根螺钉和椎板钩选择性融合治疗胸椎青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的差异
引用本文:付微平,张海鹰,楚 戈,项泽文,王福忠,卢 勇. 椎弓根螺钉和椎板钩选择性融合治疗胸椎青少年特发性脊柱侧弯的差异[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2011, 15(22): 4051-4055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.22.015
作者姓名:付微平  张海鹰  楚 戈  项泽文  王福忠  卢 勇
作者单位:1新疆生产建设兵团农九师医院骨科,新疆维吾尔自治区塔城市 8347002新疆第一济困医院,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 8300003新疆自治区中医医院脊柱一科,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 8300004新疆麦盖提县医院外二科,新疆维吾尔自治区喀什市 8440005新疆医科大学附属中医医院,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市 830000
摘    要:背景:既往的文献多报道用椎板钩或联合椎弓根螺钉治疗特发性脊柱侧弯或讨论融合节段的选择。目的:比较椎弓根螺钉和椎板钩治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧弯临床疗效的差异,并行影像学评价。方法:选择66例连续观察的青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(胸段主弯、腰段代偿弯)患者,均行后路内固定融合,末端融合到T12或L1椎体。其中32例行椎板钩内固定,34例行椎弓根螺钉内固定,内固定后最少随访2年。结果与结论:椎弓根螺钉组患者内固定后胸段Cobb角矫正程度及腰段Cobb角自发矫正程度明显大于椎板钩组(P < 0.001)。椎板钩组内固定后13例患者冠状面朝左侧失代偿大于20 mm(参照C7铅垂线),而椎弓根内固定组仅4例,差异有显著性意义(P < 0.005)。两组患者均无并发症发生。提示后路选择性融合治疗特发性脊柱侧弯(胸段主弯、腰段代偿弯),与椎板钩相比,椎弓根螺钉有更好的矫正效果且内固定后冠状面失代偿发生率低。

关 键 词:特发性脊柱侧弯  青少年  椎弓根螺钉  椎板钩  后路选择性融合  
收稿时间:2010-11-25

Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Hooks versus pedicle screws
Fu Wei-ping,Zhang Hai-ying,Chu Ge,Xiang Ze-wen,Wang Fu-zhong,Lu Yong. Selective posterior thoracic fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Hooks versus pedicle screws[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2011, 15(22): 4051-4055. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.22.015
Authors:Fu Wei-ping  Zhang Hai-ying  Chu Ge  Xiang Ze-wen  Wang Fu-zhong  Lu Yong
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Previous reports have documented to use hooks or pedicle screws with hooks in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), or to discuss selective spinal segment for fusion.OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical and radiographic results of selective posterior thoracic fusion using hooks versus pedicle screws in AIS patients. METHODS:Sixty-six consecutive patients with major thoracic-compensatory lumbar C modifier AIS curves underwent selective posterior thoracic fusion to T12 or L1 at a single institution. Hooks were used for instrumentation in 32 patients and pedicle screws were used in 34 patients. Patients were evaluated at a minimal 2-year follow-up.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no statistical difference between the preoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb values for the hook group versus the pedicle screw group. The amount of correction obtained surgically of the thoracic Cobb and the amount of spontaneous lumbar Cobb correction were significantly greater in the pedicle screw group (P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative coronal decompensation, with a greater than 20 mm shift to the left of the C7 plumb line, was higher in the hook group (13 patients) as compared with the pedicle screw group (4 patients) (P < 0.005). There were no complications or reoperations in either group. Selective thoracic fusion of main thoracic-compensatory lumbar C modifier AIS curves with pedicle screws allowed better thoracic correction and less postoperative coronal decompensation than that with hooks.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号