首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

抗戊型肝炎病毒IgG和IgM抗体对诊断急性戊型肝炎的意义
作者姓名:Li K  Zhuang H  Zhu W  Ruan B  Jiang J  Li S  Zhai Q  Yao Z  Tang R  Chen Y
作者单位:北京医科大学微生物学系!100083(李奎,庄辉,朱万孚),浙江医科大学附属第一医院(阮冰),福州市传染病医院(江家骥),安徽医科大学(李盛),新疆医学院附属第一医院(翟琦),哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院(姚桢),广西柳州卫生学校(唐荣兰),长春市传染病医院(陈雅洁)
基金项目:“九五”国家重点医学科技攻关课题,美国纽约中华医学基金
摘    要:目的 探讨抗戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)IgG和IgM抗体对诊断急性戊型肝炎(HE)的意义。方法 应用酶联免疫法(EIA)检测我国7个城市共计143例散发性HE病人急性期血清和其中56例病人的359份系列血清,以及4只实验感染HEV猕猴的68份系列血清的抗-HEVIgM和IgG。结果 7个城市143例散发性HE病人急性期血清抗-HEVIgG阳性率为100.0%,明显高于抗-HEVIgM(73.4%),9

关 键 词:戊型肝炎  血清诊断  IgG  IgM  EIA

A preliminary study on hepatitis E virus antibody IgG and IgM for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E
Li K,Zhuang H,Zhu W,Ruan B,Jiang J,Li S,Zhai Q,Yao Z,Tang R,Chen Y.A preliminary study on hepatitis E virus antibody IgG and IgM for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E[J].Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine,1999,38(11):733-736.
Authors:Li K  Zhuang H  Zhu W  Ruan B  Jiang J  Li S  Zhai Q  Yao Z  Tang R  Chen Y
Institution:Department of Microbiology, Beijing Medical University, Beijing 100083.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of hepatitis E virus antibody (anti-HEV) IgG and IgM for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E. METHODS: Acute phase sera from a total of 143 patients with sporadic hepatitis E in 7 cities of China were determined for anti-HEV IgM and IgG by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA). 359 serial sera of 56 patients with hepatitis E and 68 serial sera of 4 rhesus macaques experimentally infected with hepatitis E virus (HEV) were also detected for anti-HEV IgG and IgM. RESULTS: In the 143 patients the positive rate of anti-HEV IgG was 100.0%, which was significantly higher than that of anti-HEV IgM (73.4%, 105/143). 97.2% of anti-HEV IgG positive patients had a titer over 1:40. The positive rate of anti-HEV IgM increased with the titer of anti-HEV IgG in sera. It was 0% (0/4), 44.4% (8/18) and 80.2% (97/121), respectively in patients with the anti-HEV IgG titer of 1:20, 1:40 and >or=1:80 (P < 0.001). All the anti-HEV IgM positive patients were also anti-HEV IgG positive. No patients were found to be anti-HEV IgM positive alone. Anti-HEV IgG was detected as early as 2 days after onset of the disease, with a cumulative positive seroconversion rate of 100% by 1 month. The negative seroconversion rate of anti-HEV IgG increased with course of the disease and 43.3% of the patients lost their anti-HEV IgG by 6 months after illness. Though anti-HEV IgM also seroconverted at the same time as anti-HEV IgG, its cumulative positive seroconversion rate was only 71.4% and declined rapidly. Up to 37.5% of anti-HEV IgM positive patients became negative by 1 month after onset. Similar antibody responses were observed in 4 rhesus macaques experimentally infected with HEV. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that as a result of the poor sensitivity of currently available anti-HEV IgM EIA kits, anti-HEV IgG will be a more reliable marker for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E as compared with anti-HEV IgM.
Keywords:Hepatitis E    Serodiagnosis    Enzyme  linked immunosorbent assay
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号