专项护理干预在肺炎患者中的护理效果及对炎症因子的影响

目的 对比观察专项护理干预在肺炎患者中的护理效果及对炎症因子的影响。方法 选取医院2016年9月—2017年8月间收治的96例肺炎患者,按照随机数字表法分为2组,每组均为48例,对照组应用常规护理方法,观察组在此基础上联合应用专项护理方法。对比2组患者的护理质量满意度,并采用酶联免疫吸附试验检测2组护理前后白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)及降钙素原(PCT)水平。结果 观察组护理质量总满意度明显优于对照组(93.75% vs 77.08%,P<0.05);2组护理前WBC、CRP、PCT水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,观察组患者WBC、CRP、PCT水平均显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对肺炎患者采取常规护理基础上联合专项护理干预能够有效提高护理质量满意度,且能降低炎症因子水平,值得临床推广使用。

Effect of special nursing intervention on patients with pneumonia and its influence on inflammatory factors

Objective To investigate the nursing effect of special nursing intervention on patients with pneumonia and its influence on inflammatory factors. Methods A total of 96 patients with pneumonia were selected from September 2016 to August 2017. They were divided into a control group and a trial group according to the random number table, with 48 cases in each group. The control group was treated with the routine nursing method, and the trial group received the special nursing method on the basis of the routine nursing method. The nursing quality satisfactions of the two groups were compared and the white blood cell count (WBC), C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels before and after the nursing were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results The total degree of satisfaction of nursing quality in the trial group was significantly higher than that in the control group (93.75% vs 77.08%) (P<0.05). Before the nursing, there were no significant differences between the two groups in WBC, and CRP and PCT levels (P>0.05). However, after the nursing, WBC, and CRP and PCT levels in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination of routine nursing and special nursing intervention can effectively improve the satisfaction of nursing quality and reduce the level of inflammatory factors, which is worth popularizing in clinic.