Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Rectus Sheath Block in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Surgery |
| |
Authors: | Katsushi Takebayashi Masakata Matsumura Yasuhiro Kawai Takahiko Hoashi Nagato Katsura Seijun Fukuda Kenji Shimizu Takuji Inada Masugi Sato |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Surgery, Misugikai Sato Hospital, Osaka, Japan ;2.Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan ;3.Department of Surgery, Misugikai Otokoyama Hospital, Kyoto, Japan ;4.Department of Anesthesiology, Soryukai Inoue Hospital, Osaka, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | We aimed to assess the efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. Few studies have addressed the efficacy and safety associated with TAP block and RS block for laparoscopic surgery. Thirty-two patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, either with TAP and RS block (Block+ group, n = 18) or without peripheral nerve block (Block− group, n = 14). Preoperatively, TAP and RS block were performed through ultrasound guidance. We evaluated postoperative pain control and patient outcomes. The mean postoperative hospital stays were 1.56 days (Block+ group) and 2.07 days (Block− group; range, 1–3 days in both groups; P = 0.0038). A total of 11 patients and 1 patient underwent day surgery in the Block+ and Block− groups, respectively (P = 0.0012). Good postoperative pain control was more commonly observed in the Block+ group than in the Block− group (P = 0.011). TAP and RS block was effective in reducing postoperative pain and was associated with a fast recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery.Key words: TAP block, RS block, Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic surgeryInguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical operations. The debate regarding the best repair technique for inguinal hernia is ongoing. Several trials have compared the efficacy of the Lichtenstein and laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernia repair.1–6 Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia has certain advantages over open repair, such as reduced postoperative pain and morbidity, early recovery, rapid return to work, and better quality of life.3–7 Several strategies have been reported to ameliorate postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery.8The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a regional anesthetic technique that provides analgesia to the parietal peritoneum as well as to the skin and muscles of the anterior abdominal wall.9,10 Despite a relatively low risk of complications and a high success rate using modern techniques, TAP block remains overwhelmingly underused. Although the technique is technically straightforward, it has not been adopted in clinical practice.9,11 Moreover, rectus sheath (RS) block has been reported to be effective for pain management in patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair surgery.12Generally, in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, the sites of port incision are on the umbilical and bilateral middle abdomen. Those sites are associated with considerable postoperative discomfort. Thus, we performed TAP and RS block to ameliorate postoperative pain and improve patient outcomes. Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy of TAP and RS block in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|