首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

广州市HIV感染合并抑郁症状者耻辱感、压力与抑郁的结构方程模型
引用本文:乔佳颖,许志梦,张晗希,曾澄波,蔡卫平,郭艳.广州市HIV感染合并抑郁症状者耻辱感、压力与抑郁的结构方程模型[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2019,23(5):592-596.
作者姓名:乔佳颖  许志梦  张晗希  曾澄波  蔡卫平  郭艳
作者单位:中山大学公共卫生学院医学统计与流行病学系,广州,510080;广州市第八人民医院感染科,广州,510060;510080广州,中山大学公共卫生学院医学统计与流行病学系;510080广州,中山大学流动人口卫生政策研究中心
基金项目:国家自然科学基金81302517美国中华医学基金会17-271
摘    要:  目的  构建广州市艾滋病病毒(human immunodeficiency virus,HIV)感染合并抑郁症状者中耻辱感、压力与抑郁之间的结构方程模型,为改善HIV感染者抑郁症状提供参考依据。  方法  2017年8~12月对广州市第八人民医院门诊部的300名HIV感染合并抑郁症状者进行电子问卷调查,收集感染者的社会人口学特征、耻辱感、压力与抑郁情况等信息。采用结构方程模型对数据进行分析,探讨耻辱感对抑郁的影响机制。  结果  300名HIV感染合并抑郁症状者中,平均年龄28.2岁,92.3%为男性,抑郁量表得分M(P25,P75)为23(19,28)分,提示中度抑郁。对耻辱感与抑郁构建结构方程模型显示,模型拟合良好(Chi-Square/df=1.52,RMSEA=0.04,CFI=0.98,SRMR=0.04)。中介效应结果显示,耻辱感与抑郁之间的直接作用具有统计学意义(β=0.31,P < 0.001),压力在耻辱感与抑郁程度之间的间接作用同样具有统计学意义(β=0.25,P < 0.001)。压力在耻辱感与抑郁程度之间呈部分中介作用。  结论  压力是HIV感染者耻辱感导致抑郁的重要中间环节,今后对HIV合并抑郁症状者的干预可以重点考虑对压力进行干预。

关 键 词:艾滋病病毒感染者  耻辱感  抑郁  压力  结构方程模型
收稿时间:2018-11-22

A structural equation model of HIV-related stigma,stress and depression among people living with HIV and depression in Guangzhou
Institution:1.Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China2.Infectious Disease Department, Guangzhou eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510060, China3.Sun Yat-sen Center for Migrant Health Policy, Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510080, China
Abstract:  Objective  To examine the mechanism among HIV-related stigma, perceived stress, and severity of depression among people living with HIV and depression (PLWHD).  Methods  A total of 300 PLWHD were recruited from a large HIV treatment hospital in Guangzhou, China from August to October in 2017. Participants completed measures assessing HIV-related stigma, perceived stress, depression, and socio-demographic characteristics at baseline. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to examine the direct and indirect associations between stigma and depression.  Results  Among the 300 participants (mean age=28.21 years, 92.3% male), the median score of CES-D was 23.0 (19.0, 28.0).The global model showed good model fit (Chi-square value=25.97, CFI=0.98, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.04). Structural equation model revealed that stigma had significantly direct (pathway coefficient=0.31, P < 0.001) and indirect (pathway coefficient=0.25, P < 0.001) effects on depression.  Conclusions  Stress plays an important role in the mechanism between stigma and depression, thus future interventions need to pay more attention on stress.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华疾病控制杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华疾病控制杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号