首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

复合树脂的不同固化方法对抗压强度影响
引用本文:徐晓,崔智骁. 复合树脂的不同固化方法对抗压强度影响[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2001, 10(1): 15-16
作者姓名:徐晓  崔智骁
作者单位:上海第二医科大学附属第九人民医院口腔内科
摘    要:目的 探讨不同固化方法处理后对复合树脂抗压强度的影响。方法 采用光固化、光固化+光固化、光固化+热固化,3种不同固化方法处理3M和贺利氏复合树脂,在万能验试机上测试抗压强度。结果 2次处理的复合树脂抗压强度均比1次处理的复合树脂有较大提高,范围在51.8%-91.6%之间。不同的2次固化方法相比,统计学无显著差异。结论 复合树脂经2次固化方法处理,其抗压强度高于1次光固化方法的处理。

关 键 词:2次固化 抗压强度 复合树脂 牙修复
修稿时间:2000-05-25

Effect of composite resins with different curing methods on compressive strength
Xu Xiao,chui Zhixiao. School of Stomatology,ShangHai Second Medical University,ShangHai. Effect of composite resins with different curing methods on compressive strength[J]. Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices, 2001, 10(1): 15-16
Authors:Xu Xiao  chui Zhixiao. School of Stomatology  ShangHai Second Medical University  ShangHai
Affiliation:Xu Xiao,chui Zhixiao. School of Stomatology,ShangHai Second Medical University,ShangHai 200011
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of composite resins dealedwith different curing methods on compressive strength. Methods The compressive strength change were determined by dealing with 3M composite resins and Herues composite resins by light cured, light cured + light cured and light cured + heat cured. Results The compressive strength with secondary cure was significantly higher than that of control groups (light cured only),a range from 51.8%~91.6% (P<0.05) , but there were no statistical difference between two secondary cure groups. Conclusion The compressive strength of secondary cured composite resins is higher than that of light cured only.
Keywords:Secondary cure Compressive strength Composite resin  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号