Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle

Aim: The aim of this prospective comparative pilot study was to evaluate hard and soft peri‐implant tissues in patients with a missing adjacent central and lateral upper incisor treated with either one implant and an implant crown with a cantilever or two implants with solitary implant crowns up to 1 year after functional loading. Material and methods: In the “Implant–cantilever group”, five patients were treated with one dental implant in the region of the central incisor (NobelReplace Groovy Regular Platform). In the “Implant–implant group”, five patients were treated with two adjacent dental implants: at the position of the central incisor (NobelReplace Groovy Regular Platform) and at the position of the lateral incisor (NobelReplace Groovy Narrow Platform). Implant survival, pocket probing depth, papilla index, marginal bone level and patient satisfaction were assessed during a 1‐year follow‐up period. Results: No implants were lost during the 1‐year follow‐up. Mean pocket probing values of the implants were comparable between the two groups. Papilla index scores in both groups were relatively low, pointing towards a compromised papilla. Marginal bone loss was minimal and comparable between the groups. Patient satisfaction was very high in both groups. Conclusion: In this 1‐year prospective comparative study, no large differences in hard‐ and soft‐tissue levels could be shown between patients with a missing central and lateral upper incisor treated with either one implant and an implant crown with a cantilever or two implants with solitary implant crowns. To cite this article:
Tymstra N, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Dental implant treatment for two adjacent missing teeth in the maxillary aesthetic zone: a comparative pilot study and test of principle.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 207–213.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02017.x