首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

使用非那根预防非溶血性输血反应必要性分析
引用本文:骆宜茗,樊亚群,骆锦忠,李志峰,谢泗停. 使用非那根预防非溶血性输血反应必要性分析[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2006, 28(3): 22-23
作者姓名:骆宜茗  樊亚群  骆锦忠  李志峰  谢泗停
作者单位:福建医科大学附属厦门市第一医院血液科,361003
摘    要:目的探讨使用非那根预防非溶血性输血反应是否必要。方法选取2002年10月至2004年4月在我院血液科住院期间需要治疗性输注红细胞的患者337例次,分成两组,一组输血前预防性使用非那根(预防组),另一组输血前不预防使用非那根(对照组)。观察两组之间发生非溶血性输血反应发生率。结果预防组发生非溶血性输血反应的发生率为2.89%,对照组发生非溶血性输血反应的发生率为4.27%,两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论输血前预防性使用非那根无意义。

关 键 词:非那根  非溶血性输血反应  预防
文章编号:1002-2600(2006)03-0022-02

Study on the necessary of using promethazine to prevent non-hemolytic transfusion reaction
Luo Yiming, Fan Yaqun, Luo Jinzhong, et al. Study on the necessary of using promethazine to prevent non-hemolytic transfusion reaction[J]. Fujian Medical Journal, 2006, 28(3): 22-23
Authors:Luo Yiming   Fan Yaqun   Luo Jinzhong   et al
Affiliation:Department of Haemotology, Xiamen First Hospital Affiated To Fujian Medical University, Xiamen 361003, China
Abstract:Objective To study whether it is necessary to use promethazine to prevent non-hemolytic transfusion reaction. Methods Three were 337 cases from October 2002 to April 2004 in the Department of Haematology in Xiamen First Hostpital who need red blood cells transfusion. These cases were separated into two groups. In one group promethazine was preventively used before blood transfusion. The other group without using it for prevention as a contrast group. Then we detected the frequency of non-hemolytic blood-transfusion reaction appeared in these two groups. Results The non-hemolytic blood-transfusion reaction was 2. 89% in promethazine group. The contrast group had frequency of 4. 27%. There was no significant difference between them (P>0. 05). Conclusion It is unnecessary to use promethazine as a prevention before blood-transfusion.
Keywords:Promethazine  Non-hemolytic transfusion reaction  Prevention
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号