首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的临床观察
引用本文:崔建国,冯万文,徐毓林,常伶文,杨广智. 不同髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的临床观察[J]. 黑龙江医药, 2011, 24(5): 805-808
作者姓名:崔建国  冯万文  徐毓林  常伶文  杨广智
作者单位:江苏省连云港市第一人民医院东方医院骨科,222042
摘    要:目的:比较磁力导航髓内钉与普通带锁髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效。方法:采用带锁髓内钉与磁力导航髓内钉两种内固定方法分别治疗胫骨骨折患者35例和50例,比较两种治疗方法的手术时间、手术出血量、远端2枚锁钉锁定成功时间、一次性锁定成功率及骨折愈合时间和并发症等;术后随访12—30个月,采用Johner-Wruh评价方法,比较两种治疗方法的肢体功能恢复情况。结果:磁力导航髓内钉内固定术出血量(60.3±6.6)ml、平均手术时问(96.5±5.0)min、远端2枚锁钉锁定成功时间(6.7±2.0)min、一次性锁定成功率96%;与带锁髓内钉内固定术[110.0±8.5)ml、(170.6±6.2)nfin、(12.5±2.2)min、77%]比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0。05)。结论:两种内固定方法治疗胫骨骨折都具有较高治愈率和远期治疗效果,磁力导航髓内钉具有操作简单、使用方便、不需要x线逐视下锁钉,具有创伤小、恢复快等特点,是治疗胫骨骨折的理想方法。

关 键 词:胫骨骨折  骨折固定术  磁力导航髓内钉  带锁  髓内钉

Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Different Clinical Observation of Tibial Fractures
Cui Jianguo,et al Eastem Orthopaedic Hospital of Lianyungang No People's Hospital. Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Different Clinical Observation of Tibial Fractures[J]. Heilongjiang Medicine, 2011, 24(5): 805-808
Authors:Cui Jianguo  et al Eastem Orthopaedic Hospital of Lianyungang No People's Hospital
Affiliation:Cui Jianguo,et al Eastem Orthopaedic Hospital of Lianyungang No1 People's Hospital(Lianyungang 222042)
Abstract:Objective:To compare the magnetic navigation interlocking nail interlocking nail and general treatment of tibial fracture patients.Methods:interlocking nail interlocking nail with the magnetic navigation are two methods of internal fixation of tibial fractures were treated 35 patients and 50 patients,comparing the two treatments operation time,blood loss,distal locking nail two successful Time,success rate and a one-time lock time to fracture healing,fracture healing time and complications;were followed up ...
Keywords:tibial fractures  fracture fixation  internal  magnetic navigation intramedullary nail  interlocking intramedullary nail  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号