Enhanced peri-operative care to improve outcomes for high-risk surgical patients in Brazil: a single-centre before-and-after cohort study |
| |
Authors: | A. Stahlschmidt S. C. Passos G. R. Cardoso G. J. Schuh C. S. Gutierrez S. M. J. Castro W. Caumo R. M. Pearse the Ex-Care collaborative L. C. Stefani |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil;2. School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil;3. School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil;4. Department of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil;5. Department of Statistics, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil;6. Pain and Palliative Care Service, Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil;7. William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK;8. See online Supporting Information Appendix S1.;9. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | Mortality and morbidity for high-risk surgical patients are often high, especially in low-resource settings. Enhanced peri-operative care has the potential to reduce preventable deaths but must be designed to meet local needs. This before-and-after cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a postoperative 48-hour enhanced care pathway for high-risk surgical patients (‘high-risk surgical bundle’) who did not meet the criteria for elective admission to intensive care. The pathway comprised of six elements: risk identification and communication; adoption of a high-risk post-anaesthesia care unit discharge checklist; prompt nursing admission to ward; intensification of vital signs monitoring; troponin measurement; and prompt access to medical support if required. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Data describing 1189 patients from two groups, before and after implementation of the pathway, were compared. The usual care group comprised a retrospective cohort of high-risk surgical patients between September 2015 and December 2016. The intervention group prospectively included high-risk surgical patients from February 2019 to March 2020. Unadjusted mortality rate was 10.5% (78/746) for the usual care and 6.3% (28/443) for the intervention group. After adjustment, the intervention effect remained significant (RR 0.46 (95%CI 0.30–0.72). The high-risk surgical bundle group received more rapid response team calls (24% vs. 12.6%; RR 0.63 [95%CI 0.49–0.80]) and surgical re-interventions (18.9 vs. 7.5%; RR 0.41 [95%CI 0.30–0.59]). These data suggest that a clinical pathway based on enhanced surveillance for high-risk surgical patients in a resource-constrained setting could reduce in-hospital mortality. |
| |
Keywords: | failure-to-rescue high-risk surgical patient outcome assessment patient care team postoperative care |
|
|