首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对儿童七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响
引用本文:罗俊,王永旺,顾恩华,薛玉良.咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对儿童七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J].中国药房,2013(44):4182-4184.
作者姓名:罗俊  王永旺  顾恩华  薛玉良
作者单位:[1]天津市眼科医院/天津市眼科学与视觉科学重点实验室/天津医科大学眼科临床学院,天津300020 [2]天津市第一中心医院麻醉科,天津300192 [3]天津市泰达国际心血管病医院麻醉科,天津300457
摘    要:目的:观察咪达唑仑和丙泊酚对儿童七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动(EA)的影响。方法:选择120例行先天性斜视矫正手术的患儿,按随机数字表法均分为氯化钠注射液组(S组)、咪达唑仑组(M组)和丙泊酚组(P组)。所有患儿静脉麻醉后,M组给予咪达唑仑0.05mg/kg,静脉注射;P组给予丙泊酚1mg/kg,静脉注射;S组给予0.9%氯化钠注射液2ml,静脉注射。记录3组患儿诱导时间、麻醉维持时间、术中平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)及呼吸频率(RR);记录3组患儿苏醒和出麻醉后恢复室(PACU)时间及患儿苏醒期躁动(PAED)评分;记录所有患儿镇痛评分(CHIPPs)及EA发生率;观察3组患儿不良反应发生情况。结果:3组患儿术中诱导时间、麻醉维持时间、MAP、HR、RR、苏醒时间、出PACU时间、CHIPPs比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。M组患儿和P组患儿EA发生率及PAED评分比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但较S组患儿EA发生率和PAED评分均显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。3组患儿治疗期间均未见明显不良反应发生。结论:咪达唑仑和丙泊酚可降低七氟烷麻醉患儿EA发生率和PAED评分,提高患儿复苏质量和安全,且不延长苏醒和出PACU时间,具有较好的临床疗效。

关 键 词:丙泊酚  咪迭唑仑  七氟烷  苏醒期躁动

Effects of Midazolam and Propofol on Sevofulrane-induced Emergence Agitation in Children
LUO Jun,WANG Yong-wang,GU En-hua,XUE Yu-liang.Effects of Midazolam and Propofol on Sevofulrane-induced Emergence Agitation in Children[J].China Pharmacy,2013(44):4182-4184.
Authors:LUO Jun  WANG Yong-wang  GU En-hua  XUE Yu-liang
Institution:1.Tianjin Eye Hospital/Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science/Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300020, China; 2.Dept. of Anesthesiology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China; 3.Dept. of Anesthesiology, Tianjin TEDA International Cardiovascular Disease Hospital, Tianjin 300457, China)
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of midazolam and propofol on emergence agitation (EA) in children who received sevoflurane anesthesia. METHODS: 120 children received orthopia surgery and randomly divided into Sodium chloride injection group (S group), midazolam group (M group) and propofol group (P group). After intravenous anesthesia, M group was given midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously; P group was given propofol 1 mg/kg intravenously; S group was given 0.9% Sodium chloride injection 2 ml intravenously. The time of induction, mainttain, MAP, HR and RR were recorded in 3 groups; the time of analepsia and discharging from post anesthetic unit (PACU) were recorded as well as PAED scale. CHIPPs and the incidence of EA were recorded; the occurrence of ADR was observed in 3 groups. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in time of induction and maintain, MAP, HR, RR, the time of awaking up and discharging from PACU to the ward, CHIPP score among 3 groups (P〉0.05). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of EA and PAED score between M group and P group (P〉 0.05); the incidence of EA and PAED score were decreased significantly in S group; there was statistical significance (P〈0.05). No obvious ADR was found in 3 groups during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam and propofol can decrease the incidence of EA and PAED score in children underwent sevoflurane anesthesia, improve the quality and safety of emergence periods and doesn' t prolong time of awaking up and discharging from PACU.
Keywords:Propofol  Midazolam  Sevoflurane  Emergence agitation
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号