首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Retrieval and clinical analysis of distraction-based dual growing rod constructs for early-onset scoliosis
Authors:Genevieve Hill  Srinidhi Nagaraja  Behrooz A Akbarnia  Jeff Pawelek  Paul Sponseller  Peter Sturm  John Emans  Pablo Bonangelino  Joshua Cockrum  William Kane  Maureen Dreher
Institution:1. US Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA;2. Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, Room 2330, Jeong H. Kim Engineering Building, Bldg #225, College Park, MD 20742, USA;3. Growing Spine Study Group, 6190 Cornerstone Ct East, Suite 212, San Diego, CA 92121, USA;4. Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA;5. Cincinnati Children''s Hospital, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2017, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA;6. Boston Children''s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA;7. Growing Spine Study Group, 555 East Wells St, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA;8. Exponent, Inc., 3440 Market St, Suite 600, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Abstract:

Background Context

Growing rod constructs are an important contribution for treating patients with early-onset scoliosis. These devices experience high failure rates, including rod fractures.

Purpose

The objective of this study was to identify the failure mechanism of retrieved growing rods, and to identify differences between patients with failed and intact constructs.

Study Design/Setting

Growing rod patients who had implant removal and were previously enrolled in a multicenter registry were eligible for this study.

Patient Sample

Forty dual-rod constructs were retrieved from 36 patients across four centers, and 34 of those constructs met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen constructs failed due to rod fracture. Sixteen intact constructs were removed due to final fusion (n=7), implant exchange (n=5), infection (n=2), or implant prominence (n=2).

Outcome Measures

Analyses of clinical registry data, radiographs, and retrievals were the outcome measures.

Methods

Retrievals were analyzed with microscopic imaging (optical and scanning electron microscopy) for areas of mechanical failure, damage, and corrosion. Failure analyses were conducted on the fracture surfaces to identify failure mechanism(s). Statistical analyses were performed to determine significant differences between the failed and intact groups.

Results

The failed rods fractured due to bending fatigue under flexion motion. Construct configuration and loading dictate high bending stresses at three distinct locations along the construct: (1) mid-construct, (2) adjacent to the tandem connector, or (3) adjacent to the distal anchor foundation. In addition, high torques used to insert set screws may create an initiation point for fatigue. Syndromic scoliosis, prior rod fractures, increase in patient weight, and rigid constructs consisting of tandem connectors and multiple crosslinks were associated with failure.

Conclusion

This is the first study to examine retrieved, failed growing rod implants across multiple centers. Our analysis found that rod fractures are due to bending fatigue, and that stress concentrations play an important role in rod fractures. Recommendations are made on surgical techniques, such as the use of torque-limiting wrenches or not exceeding the prescribed torques. Additional recommendations include frequent rod replacement in select patients during scheduled surgeries.
Keywords:Early-onset scoliosis  Failure analysis  Fractography  Growing rod  Growth friendly technique  Pediatric  Retrieval analysis  Spinal instrumentation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号