首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

同一术者ERCP+LC与LECBD+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的对比分析
引用本文:范卫填,邱思远,纪任,刘春红,朱洪涛,卢宠茂.同一术者ERCP+LC与LECBD+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的对比分析[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2020,32(6):331-335.
作者姓名:范卫填  邱思远  纪任  刘春红  朱洪涛  卢宠茂
作者单位:香港大学深圳医院 肝胆胰外科,广东 深圳 518053
摘    要:目的 比较同一术者操作的内镜下逆行性胆胰管造影+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ERCP+LC)和腹腔镜胆总管探查+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LECBD+LC)两种微创手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效。方法 收集2017 年1 月至2018 年7 月期间香港大学深圳医院肝胆胰外科收治的胆囊结石合并胆总管结石病例102 例,患者接受同一术者操作的ERCP+LC(n=65)或LECBD+LC(n=37),对两组手术中转率、胆总管结石清除率、手术时间、手术出血量、术后并发症发生率、住院时间等临床数据进行统计比较。 ERCP+LC组在手术时间(129.88±47.91)min vs (183.54±74.75)min,P<0.05]、住院时间(7.15±3.14)d vs( 10.68±5.00)d,P<0.05]方面优于LECBD+LC组;在手术中转率、胆总管结石清除率、手术出血量、手术并发症发生率方面,两组无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 ERCP+LC和LECBD+LC均是治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的有效方法,应该根据患者的具体情况进行选择,术者同时熟练掌握两种方法才可能使患者获益。

关 键 词:胆囊结石  胆总管结石  内镜下逆行性胆胰管造影术  腹腔镜胆总管探查术  腹腔镜胆囊切除术  
收稿时间:2019-12-27

Comparative analysis on ERCP+LC versus LECBD+LC for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis by the same operator
AN Wei-tian,QIU Si-yuan,JI Ren,LIU Chun-hong,ZHU Hongtao,LU Chong-mao.Comparative analysis on ERCP+LC versus LECBD+LC for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis by the same operator[J].Journal of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery,2020,32(6):331-335.
Authors:AN Wei-tian  QIU Si-yuan  JI Ren  LIU Chun-hong  ZHU Hongtao  LU Chong-mao
Institution:Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518053, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+LC) versus laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct+laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LECBD+LC) in treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis operated by the same surgeon. Methods The clinical data of 102 patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who treated in The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital from Jan. 2017 to Jul. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon, 65 cases were treated by ERCP+LC and 37 cases were treated by LECBD+LC. The clinical data such as conversion rate, choledocholithiasis clearance rate, total operation time, operation blood loss, postoperative complication rate and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Results No death occurred in either group. Compared with those in LECBD+LC group, the total operation time (129.88±47.91) min vs (183.54±74.75) min,P<0.05] and hospitalization time (7.15±3.14) d vs (10.68±5.0) d, P<0.05] were shorter in ERCP+LC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in conversion rate, choledocholithiasis clearance rate, intraoperative blood loss, or postoperative complication rate (P>0.05). Conclusion ERCP+LC and LECBD+LC are both effective methods for treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis, which should be selected according to the specific conditions of the patient. Only proficient in both methods may benefit the patient.
Keywords:cholecystolithiasis  choledocholithiasis  endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreat-ography  laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct  laparoscopic cholecystectomy  
点击此处可从《肝胆胰外科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肝胆胰外科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号