首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

比色板标准与非标准色标识别差异的初探
引用本文:徐明明,许桐楷,刘峰,任抒欣,冯海兰.比色板标准与非标准色标识别差异的初探[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2009,44(7).
作者姓名:徐明明  许桐楷  刘峰  任抒欣  冯海兰
作者单位:1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院特诊科,100081
2. 北京大学口腔医学院·修复科,100081
3. 北京大学口腔医学院·第一门诊部,100081
摘    要:目的 测试口腔修复学专业研究生对比色板标准色标与非标准色标颜色识别的差异,评价、分析口腔修复学专业研究生临床实际比色能力,为探讨临床比色教学方法提供客观的基础数据.方法 选择具有1~5年临床工作经验、排除色觉识别障碍、经过色彩学知识培训的口腔修复学专业研究生62名.从比色板A(Lineargnide)的29个标准色标中通过随机数字表抽取7个色标作为标准色标,以比色板B(Vita Bleachadgnide 3D-Master)中的7个色标作为非标准色标,在D55标准光源下,以比色板C(Vita 3D-Master)作为比色工具,对标准色标和非标准色标进行比色测试.计算受试者对两种色标比色的总体准确率;统计比色正确的人数分布,并进行Monte Carlo确切概率法检验;统计比色结果在明度、饱和度、色相上的等级偏差,并进行Wilcoxin符号秩和检验.结果 受试者对标准色标比色的总体正确率为45.9%(199/434),对非标准色标比色的总体正确率为9.0%(39/434);对两种色标比色正确的人数分布的差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);对两种色标比色结果的明度等级偏差分别为0.2(0.1~0.3)、0.4(0.4~0.5)]、饱和度等级偏差分别为0.2(0.1~0.4)、0.5(0.4~0.6)]的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),色相等级偏差分别为0.3(0.1~0.4)、0.3(0.1~0.4)]的差异无统计学意义(P=0.079>0.01).结论 口腔修复学专业研究生对比色板非标准色标颜色的识别能力明显低于对标准色标颜色的识别能力.

关 键 词:美学  牙科  比色  准确性

Comparison of shade matching accuracy of tabs of shadeguide and tabs out of shadeguide
XU Ming-ming,XU Tong-kai,LIU Feng,REN Shu-xin,FENG Hai-lan.Comparison of shade matching accuracy of tabs of shadeguide and tabs out of shadeguide[J].Chinese Journal of Stomatology,2009,44(7).
Authors:XU Ming-ming  XU Tong-kai  LIU Feng  REN Shu-xin  FENG Hai-lan
Abstract:Objective To compare the shade matching accuracy between tabs of shade guide and tabs out of shade guide by prosthodontists.Methods Sixty-two graduate students who had 1 to 5 years clinical experience without color blindness were included in this study.Twenty-nine tabs from Vita 3D-Master shadeguide and 7 tabs out of Vita 3D-Master shade guide but from Vita Bleachedguide 3D-Master were taken as the targets of shade matching and observed under the standard light.Subjects' shade matching accuracy on tabs of shadeguide and tabs out of shadeguide was recorded.Frequency of right match was analyzed using Monte Carlo exact probability-test Wilcoxin test was used to analyze the difference between each group on ranked data of value,chroma and hue.Results The shade matching accuracy of tabs of shade guide45.9%(199/434)]was significantly higher than that of tabs out of shade guide9.0%(39/434)].There was significant difference between the two kinds of tabs of ranked data of value0.2 (0.1~0.3),0.4(0.4~0.5)]and chroma0.2(0.1~0.4),0.5(0.4~0.6),P<0.01 ],but there was no significant difference in hue data0.3(0.1~0.4),0.3(0.1~0.4)].Conclusions The shade matching ability of prosthodontists on tabs out of shade guide is lower than that on tabs of shadeguide.To fulfill clinical need,more training is necessary.
Keywords:Esthetic  dental  Shade matching  Accuracy
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号