两种不同手术方法治疗股骨颈基底型骨折的疗效研究

目的对比观察闭合复位空心钉内固定与全髋关节置换两种手术方法治疗股骨颈基底型骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2004年2月—2008年10月我院收治的94例股骨颈基底型骨折患者,其中采用闭合复位空心钉内固定（A组）48例,全髋关节置换（B组）46例。平均随访时间36.5个月（20个月～ 61个月）,对比分析2组在手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用、术后下地活动时间、Harris评分的差异。结果 A组在手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用方面明显低于B组;术后下地活动时间A组明显低于B组;Harris评分术后3个月A组大于B组,术后6个月、术后1年2组无明显统计学差异。结论两种手术方法均为治疗股骨颈基底型骨折的有效措施,应根据患者的具体情况选择个体化的治疗方法。闭合复位空心钉内固定,手术简单,手术时间短,费用低,加上适当的功能锻炼,可取得较好疗效。

The clinical effects of two methods in treatment of basal type femoral neck fractures

Objective To study the clinical effects of closed reduction and internal fixation and total hip replacement surgery on treatment of basal type femoral neck fractures.Methods 94 cases of basal-type femoral neck fractures were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation(48) or total hip arthroplasty(46) for treatment of two treatment methods.The follow-up time was 36.5 months.The operation time,volume of blood during operation,cost of hospitalization,exercise time and Harris score were analazed.Result...