首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Event-related potentials and saccadic reaction times: effects of fixation point offset or change
Authors:A. Spantekow  Paul Krappmann  Stefan Everling  Hans Flohr
Affiliation:(1) Brain Research Institute, University of Bremen (NW2/PF 67), P.O.B. 33 04 40, D-28334 Bremen, Germany, e-mail: spantekow@uni-bremen.de, Tel.: +49-421-2182438, Fax: +49-421-2184932, DE;(2) Department of Physiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6 Canada, CA
Abstract:Previous studies have shown that saccadic reaction times (SRTs) are reduced if the initial fixation point (FP) disappears 200 ms (gap period) before a peripheral target is presented. This gap saccade task is associated with a negative cortical potential at the end of the gap period. To determine whether the neural processes underlying this potential account for the reduction of SRTs during gap saccade tasks, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) in 19 subjects performing a gap saccade task (gap duration 200 ms), a warning saccade task (the color of the FP changed 200 ms prior to target appearance) and an overlap task (the FP remained visible during the trial). SRTs were shortest during the gap task, longest during the overlap task and intermediate during the warning task. The gap and warning tasks were accompanied by the same widespread negative cortical potential with a maximum at the time of stimulus presentation. These findings indicate that the warning effect mediated by the disappearance of the FP during gap saccade tasks is responsible for the gap negativity which was observed by several authors. Our findings of shorter SRTs during the gap task than the warning task, however, suggest that the gap has an additional effect that probably depends on subcortical mechanisms. Received: 01 June 1998 / Accepted: 12 March 1999
Keywords:  Eye movements  Gap effect  Event-related potentials  Fixation  Humans
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号