首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗PA-HSOS和失代偿期肝硬化相关顽固性腹水的生存预后分析
引用本文:陈依然,诸葛宇征.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗PA-HSOS和失代偿期肝硬化相关顽固性腹水的生存预后分析[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2021,46(8):1027-1032.
作者姓名:陈依然  诸葛宇征
作者单位:东南大学 医学院, 江苏 南京 210000
摘    要:目的比较含吡咯里西啶植物诱发的肝窦阻塞综合征(PA-HSOS)和失代偿期肝硬化合并顽固性腹水行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗病人的生存预后。方法回顾性分析141例PA-HSOS和42例失代偿期肝硬化并发顽固性腹水采用TIPS治疗的病人的临床资料,采用Kaplan-Meier分析计算2组病人TIPS术后生存率,并采用log-rank检验进行比较。并采用倾向性评分匹配(PSM),卡钳值设置为0.2,以1∶1匹配年龄、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、术前显性肝性脑病、术前门静脉系统血栓、门静脉血流速度。结果所有病人的中位随访时间为16.57个月。PA-HSOS病人的术前Child-Pugh分级和MELD评分均高于失代偿期肝硬化病人(P < 0.01),2组病人TIPS术后生存时间差异无统计学意义16.63(10.67~26.60)个月vs 16.47(9.40~41.53)个月](P>0.05)。进行倾向性评分匹配后,24例PA-HSOS和24例失代偿期肝硬化病人成功匹配,PA-HSOS病人的术后生存时间长于失代偿期肝硬化病人15.17(10.27~27.03)个月vs 13.75(10.67~21.07)个月](P < 0.01)。结论TIPS治疗PA-HSOS或失代偿期肝硬化相关顽固性腹水,尽管前者术前肝功能和门静脉血流动力学更差,但PA-HSOS病人术后生存不劣于失代偿期肝硬化病人。

关 键 词:肝窦堵塞综合征    吡咯里西啶    失代偿期肝硬化    顽固性腹水    经颈静脉肝内门体分流术    预后
收稿时间:2021-06-08

Analysis of survival prognosis of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of PA-HSOS and decompensated cirrhose-related refractory ascites
CHEN Yi-ran,ZHUGE Yu-zheng.Analysis of survival prognosis of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of PA-HSOS and decompensated cirrhose-related refractory ascites[J].Journal of Bengbu Medical College,2021,46(8):1027-1032.
Authors:CHEN Yi-ran  ZHUGE Yu-zheng
Institution:School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210000, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the survival prognosis of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS) in the treatment of pyrrolizidine alkaloids-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome(PA-HSOS) and decompensated cirrhose-related refractory ascites.MethodsThe clinical data of 141 patients with PA-HSOS and 42 patients with decompensated cirrhose-related refractory ascites were retrospective analyzed.The survival rates in two groups after TIPS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the results of which was compared using log-rank test.The propensity score matching(PSM) was used, the caliper value was set to 0.2.The age, end-stage model of liver disease(MELD) score, preoperative dominant hepatic encephalopathy, preoperative portal venous thrombosis and portal venous blood flow velocity were matched by 1:1.ResultsThe median survival time in all cases was 16.57 months.The preoperative Child-Pugh grade and MELD score in PA-HSOS patients were higher than those in decompensated cirrhosis patients(P < 0.01).There was no statistical significance in the survival time after TIPS between two groups16.63 (10.67-26.60) months vs 16.47 (9.40-41.53) months] (P>0.05).After propensity score matching, 24 cases with PA-HSOS were successfully matched with 24 cases with decompensated cirrhosis.The survival time of PA-HSOS patients was longer than that of decompensated cirrhosis patients15.17(10.27-27.03) months vs 13.75(10.67-21.07) months] (P < 0.01).ConclusionsThe TIPS can treat the PA-HSOS or decompensated cirrhose-related refractory ascites.Although the former has poorer preoperative liver function and portal hemodynamics, the PA-HSOS patients do not have worse postoperative survival compared with the decompensated cirrhose-related refractory ascites patients.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《蚌埠医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《蚌埠医学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号