Reproductive decisions by couples undergoing artificial insemination with donor sperm for severe male infertility: implications for medical counselling

Since 1992, ICSI has been introduced as a successful treatment for male infertility, including azoospermia. The present study is aimed at evaluating the practice of insemination with donor sperm (AID) in infertile couples who may benefit from the new developments that ICSI has brought in the last decade. AID was performed in 440 heterosexual couples. Twelve couples were lost for follow-up (3%). In 128 (29.9%) and 229 (53.5%) of the couples the husband was either oligozoospermic (OAT) or azoospermic. In 60 couples (14.0%) the man had a transmissible genetic trait. In 11 couples (2.6%) there were other indications for performing AID. In the OAT group 36 couples never had ICSI treatment (28.1%) because they had already an AID child born before the introduction of ICSI (n = 16), the burden of ICSI treatment was too high (n = 9) or they considered that ICSI success rate was too low (n = 7). Ninety-two couples tried ICSI treatment before opting for AID (71.9%), mainly because ICSI failed (n = 43). In 229 couples the husband had azoospermia (53.5%). In 112 couples (49%) no sperm or too few testicular sperm were found at testicular biopsy (TESE) and 15 couples (6.5%) had more than three failed ICSI-TESE attempts. Eighty-one azoospermic men refused TESE (35.4%) because of an anticipated low success rate (n = 28) or the burden of this approach (n = 23). Although a majority of patients could opt for ICSI, our results show that AID is still an option for many couples for whom these techniques were either not feasible or not successful. A substantial proportion of patients (33%) did not even opt for these advanced fertility treatments.