首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Endometrial Cancer After Endometrial Ablation vs Medical Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
Affiliation:1. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia;2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia;1. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital of Norther Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark;2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark;3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark;1. Institut Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, Institut d''Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;2. Anesthesiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;3. Immunology Department, Hospital Clínic, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract:Study ObjectiveTo investigate whether endometrial ablation is associated with increased risk or delayed diagnosis of endometrial cancer compared with medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding.DesignMulti-centered retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).SettingThe study was performed using data from The Health Improvement Network, a representative population-based cohort of patients in 495 outpatient general practitioner practices in the United Kingdom.PatientsWomen aged >25 years with abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosed between June 1994 and September 2010.InterventionsEndometrial ablation, medical management, or both.Measurements and Main ResultsA total of 234 721 women met study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 4776 of whom underwent endometrial ablation and the remaining 229 945 received medical management. Cox models compared endometrial cancer rates between ablation and medical management groups using hazard ratios. To investigate a possible diagnostic delay, the median time from bleeding diagnosis to endometrial cancer diagnosis in women in whom endometrial cancer developed was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. All statistical tests were 2-tailed, with α = .05. During a median observation period of 4.07 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.88–7.17), endometrial cancer developed in 3 women in the ablation group and 601 women in the medical management group (ablation hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.15–1.40; p = .17). Median time to diagnosis was 237 in the ablation group, and 299 days in the medical management group (ablation IQR, 155–1350; medical management IQR, 144–1133.5; p = .99). Adjusted and sensitivity analyses did not change the results.ConclusionsNo difference was observed in endometrial cancer rates, and there was no delay in diagnosis when comparing endometrial ablation vs medical management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of previous ablation exposure on histology or cancer stage at manifestation of endometrial cancer.
Keywords:Endometrial ablation techniques  Endometrial neoplasms  Menorrhagia  Uterine neoplasms
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号