首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

快速酶免疫法与粪检法检测华支睾吸虫病的比较分析
引用本文:黄锦荣. 快速酶免疫法与粪检法检测华支睾吸虫病的比较分析[J]. 中国卫生检验杂志, 2000, 10(2): 150-151
作者姓名:黄锦荣
作者单位:广东省翁源县卫生防疫站,512600
摘    要:目前,华支睾吸虫的诊断主要依靠快速酶免疫诊断试剂盒和粪检,为对这二种方法进行比较,选356名学生,同时进行血清学抗体和粪便虫卵的检测,抗体阳性率8.71%(31/356),虫卵阳性率8.15%(29/356),二者无显著性差异,其中二法均阳性26例,阳性符合率89.66%,二法均阴性322例,阴性符合率98.47%,总符合率97.75%,表明快速酶免疫法与粪检法作为诊断华支睾吸虫病的二种不同的检测

关 键 词:华支睾吸虫病 快速酶免疫诊断试剂盒 粪检法
文章编号:1004-8685(2000)02-0150-02
修稿时间:1999-08-10

The Comparison and Analysis of Fast - ELISA and Stool Methods Examining Clonorchiasis sinensis
Huang Jinrong. The Comparison and Analysis of Fast - ELISA and Stool Methods Examining Clonorchiasis sinensis[J]. Chinses Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2000, 10(2): 150-151
Authors:Huang Jinrong
Abstract:At present, the diagnosis of clonorchiasis sinensis mostly depend on the methods of both Fast - ELISA diagnostic kit and egg of stool examination. In order to compare and analyse the two methods, 356 students were picked out and examined with both egg of stool and the antibody of sera. The antibody positive rate was 8. 71 percent, and the egg positive rate was 8. 15 percent. It suggested that difference in them was not significant. Among the examined students, 26 were positive and 322 were negative. Therefore, the coincidental positive rate of the two methods were 89. 66 percent, the negative were 98. 47 percent, and the total rates were 97. 75 percent. the results showed that there was no significant difference between the methods for diagnosing clonorchiasis sinensis.
Keywords:Clonorchiasis sinensis Fast-ELISA diagnostic kit the methods of stool examination.
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号