首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

胆总管下段癌的腔内超声与ERCP诊断价值比较
引用本文:金震东,黄建伟,湛先保,李兆申,邹晓平,许国铭. 胆总管下段癌的腔内超声与ERCP诊断价值比较[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2004, 20(5): 656-658
作者姓名:金震东  黄建伟  湛先保  李兆申  邹晓平  许国铭
作者单位:1. 上海第二军医大学附属长海医院消化内科,上海,200433
2. 广东省广州市第十二人民医院消化内科
摘    要:目的比较内镜超声(EUS)、胆管腔内超声(IDUS)与内镜下逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)对胆总管下段癌的诊断价值.方法回顾分析上海长海医院1999年8月至2003年8月期间,同期施行EUS、IDUS和ERCP检查,并经手术标本病理证实的42例胆总管下段癌患者的病例资料,比较EUS、IDUS和ERCP的诊断价值.结果 42例患者中,男24例,女18例,平均年龄53.9岁.EUS检出39例(92.9%),IDUS检出42例(100%),ERCP检出40例(95.2%),三者检出率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).EUS漏检的3例病灶均局限于胆管壁,但被IDUS确诊.结论 EUS与ERCP对胆总管下段癌具有相当的检出率, EUS和ERCP联合IDUS可提高早期胆总管下段癌的诊断水平.

关 键 词:胆总管癌  腔内超声检查  内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术  胆管腔内超声

Endosonography and endoscopic retragrade cholangiopancreatography diagnosis for lower part of common bile duct cancer
JIN Zhen-dong,HUANG Jian-wei,ZHAN Xian-bao,LI Zhao-shen,ZOU Xiao-ping and XU Guo-ming. Endosonography and endoscopic retragrade cholangiopancreatography diagnosis for lower part of common bile duct cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2004, 20(5): 656-658
Authors:JIN Zhen-dong  HUANG Jian-wei  ZHAN Xian-bao  LI Zhao-shen  ZOU Xiao-ping  XU Guo-ming
Affiliation:Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) and endoscopic retragrade cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for lower part of common bile duct cancer. Methods Forty two patients who were all pathologically confirmed lower part of common bile duct cancer, including 24 males and 18 females, with a mean age of 53.9 years, underwent EUS, IDUS and ERCP examinations before operation. The data of these patients were analyzed, and the positive rate of each method was compared. Results Thirty nine cases were found by EUS (92.9%), forty two cases by IDUS (100%), and forty cases by ERCP (95.2%). There was no significant difference between the three methods ( P >0.05). Among the three cases who were not found by EUS, the lesions were limited in the wall of common bile duct and were found by IDUS. Conclusion EUS is a sensitive method to diagnose common bile duct cancer. Combined with IDUS, EUS or ERCP can improve the diagnostic level of cancer located in the lower part of common bile duct.
Keywords:Common bile duct cancer  Endoscopic ultrasonography  Endoscopic retragrade cholangiopancreatography  Intraductal ultrasonography  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号