首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

小切口非超声乳化白内障手术四种娩核方式的对比观察
引用本文:郭疆,司马晶,王抗美,李林,窦晓燕. 小切口非超声乳化白内障手术四种娩核方式的对比观察[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2012, 20(2): 158-161
作者姓名:郭疆  司马晶  王抗美  李林  窦晓燕
作者单位:深圳市第二人民医院暨深圳大学第一附属医院眼科,518035
摘    要:目的探讨小切口非超声乳化白内障手术中4种不同娩核方式的特点及疗效。方法选白内障患者200例(200只眼),随机分为4组,接受小切口非超声乳化白内障摘除联合人工晶状体植入术,分别通过黏弹剂娩核法、前房维持器娩核法、晶状体圈匙娩核法及前房内劈核法完成娩核过程,观察记录娩核时间、术后角膜水肿程度及术后视力。结果娩核时间(s):黏弹剂组:11±2,维持器组:17±2,圈匙组:24±3,劈核组:63±5,经方差分析及最小显著性差异法(least-significant difference,LSD)检验,各组间均有统计学差异(P=0.00);术后第1天角膜内皮水肿(≥2级)眼数(只)黏弹粘组:7(15%),维持器组:10(20%),圈匙组:19(40%),劈核组:38(75%),经检验,劈核组与黏弹粘组、维持器组以及圈匙组均存在统计学差异(Z=-7.477,-6.882,-4.294;P=0.00),黏弹剂组与圈匙组存在统计学差异(Z=-3.281;P=0.001)。术后第1天视力≥0.3的眼数(只):黏弹剂组:45(90%),维持器组:43(85%),圈匙组:33(65%),劈核组:13(25%),经检验,黏弹剂组优于圈匙组和劈核组(P=0.00),维持器组和圈匙组均优于劈核组(P=0.00)。结论在临床应用中,4种娩核方式各有特点。其中,黏弹剂娩核法、前房维持器娩核法因其操作简便,损伤小,术后视力恢复良好,值得临床推广。

关 键 词:黏弹粘娩核  小切口白内障手术  白内障[临床眼科杂志  2012  20:158

Comparison of four different nucleus delivery methods in small incision cataract surgery
GUO JIANG , SI Ma-jing , WANG Kang-mei , LI Lin , DOU Xiao-yan. Comparison of four different nucleus delivery methods in small incision cataract surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology, 2012, 20(2): 158-161
Authors:GUO JIANG    SI Ma-jing    WANG Kang-mei    LI Lin    DOU Xiao-yan
Affiliation:.Department of Ophthalmology,the 2nd People’s Hospital of Shenzhen(Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University),Shenzhen 518035,China
Abstract:Objective To contrast clinical efficacy of four different nucleus delivery methods in small incision cataract surgery.Methods 200 patients(200 eyes) with senile cataract under went cataract surgery.These patients were divided into four groups(50 eyes each group) randomly: sodium hyaluronate irrigation group、anterior chamber maintainer group、lens loop extracting nucleus group and manual fragmentation group.Visual acuity、average extracting nucleus time and corneal edema were observed.Results The average extracting nucleus time:sodium hyaluronate irrigation group:11’±2’’,anterior chamber maintainer group:17"±2’’,lens loop extracting nucleus group:24’’±3’’,and manual fragmentation group:63’’±5’’.There was obvious difference between each other group(P=0.00).Clinical corneal edema one day after operation: sodium hyaluronate irrigation group:7cases(15%),anterior chamber maintainer group :10 cases(20%),lens loop extracting nucleus group:19 cases(40%),and manual fragmentation group:38 cases(75%).There was obvious difference between manual fragmentation group and the others(Z=-7.477,-6.882,-4.294;P=0.00).There was difference between sodium hyaluronate irrigation group and lens loop extracting nucleus group(Z=-3.281;P=0.001).Visual acuity≥0.3 one day after operation: sodium hyaluronate irrigation group:45 cases(90%),anterior chamber maintainer group :43 cases(85%),lens loop extracting nucleus group:33 cases(65%),and manual fragmentation group:13 cases(25%).There was obvious difference between sodium hyaluronate irrigation group and manual fragmentation group、anterior chamber maintainer group(P=0.00).There was obvious difference between manual fragmentation group and lens loop extracting nucleus group、anterior chamber maintainer group(P=0.00).Conclusion Each method has its characteristics in clinical application.Sodium hyaluronate irrigation and anterior chamber maintainer can be applied extensively due to simple operation,less injury and better visual acuity.
Keywords:Sodium hyaluronate irrigation nucleus delivery  Small incision cataract surgery  Caract
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号