Is DDD Superior to VVI Pacing in Mixed Carotid Sinus Syndrome? An Acute and Medium-Term Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate fhe importance of atrial synchronism for pacing therapy of patients with mixed carotid sinus syndrome. In 23 patients (21 m, two f: mean age 69 ± 8 years) affected by symptomatic mixed carotid sinus syndrome we performed: (1) Research of ventriculo-atrial conduction, orthostatic hypotension and pacemaker effect; and [2] Carotid sinus massage in the standing position during VVI and DVI temporary pacing. Next, ail patients received a permanent DDD pacemaker and entered a 2 month two period single-blind, randomized, cross-over study on DVI/DDD versus VVI mode. During the DVI/DDD period, no syncope occurred in any patients, minor symptoms persisted in 11 (48%) of them; during VVI period syncopes recurred in three patients, symptoms requiring the withdrawal of VVI pacing and premature DVI/DDD reprogramming in eight patients, minor symptoms in 17 (74%). A comparison between 14 patients, who preferred DVI/DDD period (Group A), and the remaining nine patients who noted no preference between DVI/DDD and VVI period (Group B) was performed on the basis of the preimplant evaluation. Group A patients had a greater pacemaker effect (-34 ± 16 mmHg vs -16 ± 14 mmHg) and a higher prevalence of symptomatic pacemaker effect (50% vs 0%), of ventriculo-atrial conduction (78% vs 44%) and of orthostatic hypotension (50% vs 11%), while the entity of the systolic pressure fall caused by carotid sinus massage was similar in the two groups either during VVI mode (Group A-51 ± 16 mmHg vs Group B-56 ± 27 mmHg) or DVI mode (Group A-38 ± 17 mmHg vs Group 3–45 ± 17 mmHg). Thus, we conclude that vasodepressor reflex of carotid sinus syndrome is not prevented by DVI/DDD pacing even if the loss of atrial synchronism resulting from WI pacing, by adding an important pacemaker effect, causes a more severe hemodynamic consequence. DVI/DDD pacing is more effective than VVI in 61% of patients. When pacemaker effect, ventriculoatrial conduction and orthostatic hypotension are present, VVI failure is possible, therefore DVI/DDD stimulation is indicated; on the contrary the evaluation of the vasodepressor reflex during WJ or DVI temporary pacing is of little value in the choice of the mode of pacing.