首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

高效液相色谱法与荧光偏振免疫法测定全血环孢菌素A浓度比较
引用本文:赵滨红,郭丽萍. 高效液相色谱法与荧光偏振免疫法测定全血环孢菌素A浓度比较[J]. 中南药学, 2007, 5(3): 224-227
作者姓名:赵滨红  郭丽萍
作者单位:郑州市中心医院药剂科,郑州450007
摘    要:目的探讨两种方法测定环孢菌素A浓度结果的可靠性。方法分别用高效液相法和荧光偏振免疫法测定全血中环孢菌素A浓度,比较2种方法测定结果的差异。结果2种方法的测定结果有显著性差异,FPIA法所测结果高于HPLC法。结论对环孢菌素A进行治疗药物监测时应考虑测定方法的影响。

关 键 词:环孢菌素A  高效液相色谱法  荧光偏振免疫分析法
文章编号:1672-2981(2007)03-0224-04
修稿时间:2007-02-272007-03-30

Comparison of high-preformance liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay for whole blood Cyclosporin A
ZHAO Bin-hong,GUO Li-ping. Comparison of high-preformance liquid chromatography and fluorescence polarization immunoassay for whole blood Cyclosporin A[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2007, 5(3): 224-227
Authors:ZHAO Bin-hong  GUO Li-ping
Affiliation:Pharmacy of Central Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou 450007
Abstract:Objective To explore and compare the reliability of determining the density of Cyclosporin A(CsA) by two methods.Methods To measure the density of Cyclosporin A in whole blood with high-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) and fluorescence polarization immunoassay(FPIA) respectively,and analyse the difference of outcome from the two methods.Results Significant difference was detected in the outcome from the two metheds.FPIA showed more reliable result than that of HPLC.Conclusion Attention should be given regarding the effects of measurement while evaluating the efficacy of Cyclosporin A.
Keywords:CsA   HPLC   FPIA
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号