首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

PDCA循环在麻醉恢复期躁动患者护理中的应用
引用本文:祖娟娟,杨青凤. PDCA循环在麻醉恢复期躁动患者护理中的应用[J]. 上海护理, 2016, 16(4)
作者姓名:祖娟娟  杨青凤
作者单位:南京中医院大学附属医院 210000,南京中医院大学附属医院 210000
摘    要:[摘要] 目的 探讨PDCA 循环在麻醉恢复期躁动患者护理中的应用效果。 方法 选择2015在我院全身麻醉手术后转入麻醉恢复室的120例患者,将1至6月60例患者作为对照组,7至12月60例患者为观察组。对照组按照PACU常规进行复苏护理,观察组在PACU常规护理基础上应用PDCA 循环通过计划、实施、检查、处理四个阶段进行护理和干预,密切观察两组患者在全麻恢复期出现躁动情况及不良事件进行比较。结果 观察组的躁动发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的因躁动引起的不良事件发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 实施PDCA 循环管理能够降低全麻恢复期患者躁动发生率,提高护理安全性,值得临床推广应用。

关 键 词:PDCA循环  麻醉恢复期  躁动  护理
收稿时间:2015-11-15
修稿时间:2016-03-17

Application of PDCA cycle in anesthesia recovery restless patient care
Abstract:[Abstract] Objective To explore the application effect of PDCA cycle in nursing for anesthesia recovery restlessness patients. Methods Totally 120 inpatients from Jan. to Dec. 2014 were recruited in post-anesthesia recovery room (PACU) after general anesthesia operation, each group of 60 cases, the January-June 60 patients as the control group, from July to December of 60 patients in the observation group. Control group carried out in accordance with the PACU routine nursing recovery, observation group application of PDCA circulation through four stages (plan, do, check, and action) and nursing intervention, closely observe two groups of patients in general anesthesia recovery agitation condition and nursing satisfaction. Results Observation group of agitation rate was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Observation group nursing satisfaction is significantly higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion Application of PDCA cycle management can significantly reduce the incidence of [Abstract] Objective To explore effects of PDCA cycle in nursing agitation patient recovery from anesthesia. Methods Totally 120 patients in post-anesthesia recovery room (PACU) after general anesthesia were recruited from Jan. to Dec. 2015 , and the 60 patients from July to December were classified as the observation group while the 60 patients from January to June as the control group. Patients in Control group were cared with the routine PACU nursing recovery, while patients in observation group were applied PDCA circulation including four stages (plan, conduct, check, and action). Closely observe agitation and complications happened in two groups of patients during recovery from general anesthesia in PACU. Results The incidence of agitation in observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, nursing satisfaction in observation group was much better (P <0.05). Conclusion Application of PDCA cycle management can significantly reduce the incidence of agitation in patients recovery from general anesthesia and improve the nursing satisfaction of inpatients, which calls for further application. with general anesthesia recovery restlessness, improve the nursing satisfaction of inpatients and it calls for further application.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《上海护理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《上海护理》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号