Survey of gynecologists' and interventional radiologists' opinions of uterine fibroid embolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the opinions of gynecologists and interventional radiologists regarding uterine fibroid embolization (UFE). METHODS: We mailed surveys to all gynecologists and interventional radiologists practising in Toronto, Ontario. Study criteria excluded those physicians who did not assess or treat patients with uterine fibroids. We evaluated whether they educated patients regarding UFE, together with their opinion of current and future effectiveness of UFE, self-rated knowledge of fibroid treatment options, and recommendations for treatment in several clinical scenarios. RESULTS: A total of 102 gynecologists (46.4% response rate) and 28 interventional radiologists (51.9% response rate) completed the survey. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final study population was 82 gynecologists and 17 interventional radiologists. Both groups reported high rates of patient education regarding UFE (gynecologists 100% and interventional radiologist 88.2%, P > 0.05). Interventional radiologists had higher self-rated knowledge of UFE (P = 0.05), and gynecologists had higher self-rated knowledge of all other treatment options (P = 0.00). Interventional radiologists had a more favourable opinion of the current effectiveness (P < 0.05) and future use (P > 0.05) of UFE. In 5 of the 7 clinical scenarios, interventional radiologists chose UFE, whereas gynecologists chose other treatment options (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although most gynecologists and intterventional radiologists educate their patients regarding UFE as a treatment option for uterine fibroids, interventional radiologists have greater self-rated knowledge and a higher opinion of current effectiveness and future use and recommend UFE more often for uterine fibroid scenarios.