Scheduling of gemcitabine and cisplatin in Lewis Lung tumour bearing mice |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan;2. National Therapeutic Center of Hematology of Traditional Chinese Medicine, XiYuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, PR China;3. Department of Applied Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, 1432-1 Horinouchi, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0392, Japan;4. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100091, PR China;1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center and Rouen University Hospital & QuantIF LITIS (Equipe d’Accueil (EA) 4108-Federation Recherche (FR) National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) 3638), Faculty of Medicine, University of Rouen, Rouen, 76821, France;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, 76821, France;3. Pathology Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, 76821, France |
| |
Abstract: | We used the gemcitabine (dFdC) and cisplatin (cis-diamine dichloroplatinum CDDP) resistant murine NSCLC tumour Lewis Lung (LL) in C57/Bl6 mice to optimise scheduling of both drugs, since in previous in vivo studies no effective combination schedule of both compounds was found to overcome resistance to either drug. dFdC could not be combined at the previously determined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (120 mg/kg, q3dx4) with CDDP at its MTD (9 mg/kg, q6dx2) (mean weight loss <15% and <15% toxic deaths), because of additive toxicity. Therefore, we lowered the dose of dFdC to 60 mg/kg (q3dx4) and of CDDP to 3 mg/kg (q6dx2), which caused an increase in antitumour effect compared with the activity of each compound alone at its MTD (growth delay factor (GDF)=0.55, 0.13 and 2.56 for dFdC and CDDP alone and the combination, respectively). Changing the CDDP treatment schedule giving the total dose (6 mg/kg) only at day 0 caused unacceptable toxicity. This effect was not seen when mice were treated with the total dose of CDDP on day 9, but, the anti-tumour effect was not enhanced. To decrease toxicity, the dosage of dFdC was lowered to 50 mg/kg and combined with the total dose of CDDP on day 0, which caused a better antitumour effect than the combination of 60 mg/kg dFdC and 3 mg/kg CDDP (q6dx2) with acceptable toxicity. Schedule dependency was found for the combination: dFdC preceding CDDP by 4 h was the best treatment schedule in the LL tumours (GDF: 2.1) with acceptable toxicity. However, when the interval was increased to 24 h, toxicity became unacceptable (>30% weight loss). The reverse schedule, in which CDDP preceded dFdC, did not lead to an increased antitumour effect or to increased toxicity. Adding amifostine, a selective chemoprotector, to the treatment decreased toxicity of the combination without affecting the antitumour effect. Increasing the CDDP dose to 9 mg/kg (day 0) under amifostine protection led to an improved therapeutic index. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|