首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes
Authors:Zimmermann Gerald  Moghaddam Arash
Affiliation:Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany. g.zimmermann@theresienkrankenhaus.de
Abstract:Autologous bone is used very often in the treatment of fresh fractures, delayed unions and non-unions. Alternatives have included allografts and in recent years also demineralized bone matrix. The growing availability of good synthetic bone grafts and their advantages in safety and avoiding donor-site morbidity are the reasons that these products are being used more and more. There are on the market a wide variety of substitutes with different capabilities. Nevertheless autologous bone graft is still considered as the gold standard and will be discussed here in that context. Osteoconductive, osteogenic and osteoinductive products will also be classified and their advantages and disadvantages described.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号