Dose-response relationships for edrophonium antagonism of mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block during N2O-enflurane-alfentanil anaesthesia

The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response relationships for edrophonium antagonism of mivacuriuminduced neuromuscular block. Seventy-five ASA I or II adults were given mivacurium 0.15 mg · kg^{? 1} followed by an infusion (7 μg · kg^{? 1} · min^{? 1}) during alfentanil-propofol-N₂O-enflurane anaesthesia. Train-of-four stimulation (TOF) was applied to the ulnar nerve every 20 sec and the response of the adductor pollicis was recorded (Relaxograph NMT-100. Datex, Helsinki, Finland). Mivacurium infusion was modified at five-minute intervals in order to keep the height of the first twitch in TOF (T₁) at 5% of its control value. At the end of surgery, edrophonium (0.0. 0.125, 0.25, 0.5. or 1.0 mg · kg^{? 1}) combined with glycopyrrolate (0.0, 0.0012, 0.0025, 0.005, or 0.01 mg · kg^{? 1}) were administered by random allocation. Edrophonium doses of 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg · kg^{? 1} were different from placebo with regard to time to attain a TOF ratio (fourth twitch in TOF/ T,) = 0.7 (13.8 ± 4.5, 11.1 ± 3.5, 11.4 ± 3.0 vs 19.7 ± 4.7 min P < 0.05). Doses of 0.5 and 1.0 mg · kg^{? 1} permitted faster recovery time of T₁ from 10 to 95% (T_{10– 95}) than did placebo (7.5 ± 3.8,8.9 ± 3.5 vs 14.5 ± 5.0 min P < 0.05). Edrophonium 0.5 mg · kg^{? 1} was different from placebo with regard to recovery time of T₁ from 25 to 75% (T_{25– 75}) (3.3 ± 2.0 vs 6.7 ± 2.0 min P < 0.05). Only edrophonium 0.5 mg · kg^{? 1} provided faster recovery than placebo with regard to all three indices. It is concluded that edrophonium 0.5 + glycopyrrolate 0.005 mg · kg^{? 1} allow the fastest recovery from a mivacurium-induced block during enflurane-N₂O anaesthesia.