Feeder vessel treatment of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration

INTRODUCTION: To report on the results of feeder vessel treatment for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 40 patients presenting subfoveal classic choroidal neovascularization (CCNV) and/or occult choroidal neovascularization (OCNV) with or without fibrovascular pigment epithelium detachment (PED), based on fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICG). Visual acuity was measured using Snellen lines and/or ETDRS. The feeder vessels were visualized with high-speed ICG angiography (confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, Heidelberg HRA, Heidelberg, Germany). Feeder vessels were identified as very thin vessels with early filling and rapid emptying. Feeder vessel closure was achieved by laser photocoagulation treatment with either minipulse infrared laser therapy (810 nm), microburst, or yellow laser (568 nm). Post-treatment high-speed ICG angiography follow-up was recommended to the patient immediately or the day after the treatment. The number of treatments and location of the feeder vessels in relation to the macula as well as FA, ICG, and visual acuity results were assessed. If necessary, other treatment techniques such as photodynamic therapy (PDT) or transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) were offered to the patient when leakage was still present. RESULTS: The patients were followed for an average of 6.2 months (2-9 months). Twenty-six women and 14 men (mean age, 72 years; range, 51-95) were included. Eight patients demonstrated classic neovascularization, 32 presented occult neovascularization, including 17 cases of vascularized PED and 15 retrofoveal plaques. The average number of treatments was 1.8 (range, 1-4 treatments). Location of feeder vessels were as follows: nine superior-macular, 18 inferior-macular, six nasal-macular and 11 temporal-macular. Visual acuity improved two lines or more in nine patients (22.5%), decreased 2 lines or less in five patients (12.5%) and was stable in 26 patients (65%). After feeder vessel treatment, seven patients showed improvement of the anatomical aspect of the AMD lesions, with a reduction in leakage. Except for one subretinal hemorrhage, no complications after feeder vessel treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: Feeder vessel treatment is a technique requiring high-speed ICG angiography to detect the feeder vessels located at a distance from the subfoveal OCNV, CCNV, and PED. Although the final visual acuity result was for the most part stabilization, the technique appeared to be safe and reproducible. In patients who were not eligible for other therapies such as PED, feeder vessel treatment seemed to be a reasonable alternative.