热敏灸治疗慢性前列腺炎不同灸量的临床疗效观察

目的:比较热敏灸治疗慢性前列腺炎不同灸量的临床疗效差异。方法:将60例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为个体化的消敏饱和灸量试验组(以下简称试验组)和传统灸量对照组(以下简称对照组),试验组和对照组各30例。两组均采用热敏灸治疗,试验组以热敏灸感消失为度,对照组每次15 min,两组每日2次,共治疗5d,第6d开始每日1次,连续治疗25次,共治疗35次(共30 d),于治疗前、后进行疗效评价。结果:与治疗前相比,两组在治疗后症状积分、NIH-CPSI积分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),与对照组相比,试验组症状积分、NIH-CPSI积分、显愈率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论:消敏饱和灸量试验组治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效优于传统灸量对照组,消敏定量为热敏灸取得最佳疗效的关键因素之一。

Observation of Clinical Curative Effect of Heat-sensitive Moxibustion for Chronic Prostatitis with Moxibustion of Different Quantity

Objective：To compare the clinical curative effect of heat-sensitive moxibustion for chronic prostatitis with moxibustion of dif- ferent quantity. Methods ： 60 cases of chronic prostatitis were randomly divided into observation group of 30 cases and control group of 30 cases. Both of the two groups received heat-sensitive moxibustion treatment. The observation group with moxibustion quantity of indi- vidualized, saturated and sensation vanishing,and the control group with conventional moxibustion quantity which is each time 15 mi- nutes,twice a day,5 days total, and from the sixth day once a day, continuous treatment 25 times. That means a total of 35 times were treated. Evaluation of the efficacy before and after treatment. Results ： Compared with before treatment, the symptom and NIH-CPSI score of two groups after treatment, there were significant differences （P 〈 0.01 ）. Compared with control group, the symptom score, NIH-CPSI score and cure-markedly effective rate of observation group, there were significant differences （P 〈 0.05, P 〈 0.01, P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclu- sion： The observation group with moxibustion quantity of individualized, saturated and sensation vanishing was superior to the control group with conventional moxibustion quantity to treat the chronic prostatitis. Moxibustion quantity of individualized, saturated and sensa- tion vanishing as one of the key factors for heat-sensitive moxibustion to get the best effect.