首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

人工耳蜗植入患者术后汉语声韵调识别能力临床分析
引用本文:陈艾婷,李楠,王倩,洪梦迪,焦青山,李思阳,李佳楠,杨仕明,冀飞.人工耳蜗植入患者术后汉语声韵调识别能力临床分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2020,26(6):615-619.
作者姓名:陈艾婷  李楠  王倩  洪梦迪  焦青山  李思阳  李佳楠  杨仕明  冀飞
作者单位:中国人民解放军总医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医学部 国家耳鼻咽喉疾病临床医学研究中心 聋病教育部重点实验室 聋病防治北京市重点实验室 军事声损伤防护实验室 国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心 解放军总医院医疗大数据中心,北京100853
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2005200);国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心开放课题(NCRCG PLAGH 2019007);解放军总医院医疗大数据研发项目(2018MBD 015);军事医学创新工程和青年培育项目(16QNP133);国家自然科学基金重大国际合作项目(81820108009);国家自然基金面上项目(81670940,81770991)。
摘    要:目的分析人工耳蜗(CI)植入患者术后普通话单音节声母、韵母、声调的识别能力差异,对比单双侧植入和植入时长对单音节识别的影响。方法选取单侧和双侧CI患者共63例,其中男35例,女28例,平均年龄(23.45±16.30)岁,CI植入时长(2.81±2.41)年。使用信度效度经已认证的单音节识别测试材料进行测试,记录每个患者声母、韵母、声调和总体的识别率得分情况。结果共获得70个测试结果:CI患者对声母、韵母和单音节总识别率均低于声调识别率且差异具有统计学意义(P=0.000 3;P=0.000 3;P=0.030 3)。对单音节总识别率超过50%的CI患者,声调识别率相比声母、韵母、单音节识别率显著性增高(P<0.005)。对于总识别率小于50%的患者,虽然声韵母识别率均低于声调识别率,但仅有韵母和声调之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.018 9)。单双侧CI患者声调识别率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),患者佩戴时长与单音节识别的相关性较弱。结论CI患者的声调识别效果较单音节以及声母和韵母更具有优势,声调识别会在使用CI一定时间后趋于较高水平。植入侧别对其影响较小。

关 键 词:人工耳蜗|  声调识别|单音节识别|言语感知|言语识别

Clinical analysis of Chinese Mandarin tone recognition capability in patients with cochlear implantation
CHEN Aiting,LI Nan,WANG Qian,HONG Mengdi,JIAO Qingshan,LI Siyang,LI Jianan,YANG Shiming,JI Fei.Clinical analysis of Chinese Mandarin tone recognition capability in patients with cochlear implantation[J].Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-skull Base Surgery,2020,26(6):615-619.
Authors:CHEN Aiting  LI Nan  WANG Qian  HONG Mengdi  JIAO Qingshan  LI Siyang  LI Jianan  YANG Shiming  JI Fei
Institution:College of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases; Key Lab of Hearing Impairment Science of Ministry of Education; Beijing Key Lab of Hearing Impairment for Prevention and Treatment; Key Lab of Military Sound Impairment Prevention and Treatment; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital; Medical Big Data Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Abstract:Abstract:ObjectiveTo analyze the differences between the recognition abilities of compound vowels, initial consonants, and lexical tones for cochlear implants (CI) patients, and to compare the effects of unilateral or bilateral implantation as well as the implantation time on monosyllable recognition.MethodsA total of 63 patients with unilateral and bilateral CI were recruited, including 35 males and 28 females with an average age of 23.45±16.30 and implantation duration of 2.81±2.41 years. All the patients were tested with Chinese Mandarin monosyllable recognition materials. Vowels, consonants, tones and overall recognition scores each patient were recorded.ResultsThe recognition scores vowel, consonant, and monosyllable for CI patients were lower than that of lexical tone and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.000 3; P=0.000 3; P=0.030 3). For CI patients with total recognition score of more than 50% in monosyllable recognition test, the recognition score of tone was significantly higher than those of other components (all P<0.005). For those patients with recognition score of less than 50%, results of consonant and vowel were lower than that of tone, but significant difference was only observed between consonant and tone (P=0.0189). There was no significant difference in tone recognition score of patients with unilateral and bilateral CI. The correlation between implantation time and monosyllable recognition was weak.ConclusionThe recognition of lexical tones for CI patients is better than that of monosyllable, initial consonants and compound vowels,the tore recognition score will maintain a relatively high level in a period of time after implantation. Implantation side and time produce a little effect on tone recognition.
Keywords:Cochlear implants| Tone recognition| Monosyllable recognition| Speech perception|Speech recognition
点击此处可从《中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号