首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment failures following three column thoracic osteotomy for adult spinal deformity
Authors:Virginie Lafage  Justin S. Smith  Shay Bess  Frank J. Schwab  Christopher P. Ames  Eric Klineberg  Vincent Arlet  Richard Hostin  Douglas C. Burton  Christopher I. Shaffrey
Affiliation:1. New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, 306 East 15th Street, 10003, New York, NY, USA
2. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800212, Charlottesville, VA, USA
3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, 2055 High Street Suite 130, Denver, CO, USA
4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Street, San Francisco, CA, USA
5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, 3301 C St, Suite 1500, Sacramento, CA, USA
6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, PO Box 800159, Charlottesville, VA, USA
7. Baylor Scoliosis Center, 4708 Alliance Blvd, #810, Plano, TX, USA
8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, USA
Abstract:

Purpose

Three column thoracic osteotomy (TCTO) is effective to correct rigid thoracic deformities, however, reasons for residual postoperative spinal deformity are poorly defined. Our objective was to evaluate risk factors for poor spino-pelvic alignment (SPA) following TCTO for adult spinal deformity (ASD).

Methods

Multicenter, retrospective radiographic analysis of ASD patients treated with TCTO. Radiographic measures included: correction at the osteotomy site, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI). Final SVA and PT were assessed to determine if ideal SPA (SVA < 4 cm, PT < 25°) was achieved. Differences between the ideal (IDEAL) and failed (FAIL) SPA groups were evaluated.

Results

A total of 41 consecutive ASD patients treated with TCTO were evaluated. TCTO significantly decreased TK, maximum coronal Cobb angle, SVA and PT (P < 0.05). Ideal SPA was achieved in 32 (78%) and failed in 9 (22%) patients. The IDEAL and FAIL groups had similar total fusion levels and similar focal, SVA and PT correction (P > 0.05). FAIL group had larger pre- and post-operative SVA, PT and PI and a smaller LL than IDEAL (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Poor SPA occurred in 22% of TCTO patients despite similar operative procedures and deformity correction as patients in the IDEAL group. Greater pre-operative PT and SVA predicted failed post-operative SPA. Alternative or additional correction procedures should be considered when planning TCTO for patients with large sagittal global malalignment, otherwise patients are at risk for suboptimal correction and poor outcomes.
Keywords:Spinopelvic alignment   Sagittal vertical axis   Osteotomy   Pedicle subtraction osteotomy   Thoracic   Vertebral column resection
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号