首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Biomechanical analysis of single-leg stance using a textured balance board compared to a smooth balance board and the floor: A cross-sectional study
Institution:1. KU Leuven, Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tervuursevest 101 b1501, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;2. KU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology Services, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;3. KU Leuven, Cardiovascular and Respiratory Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tervuursevest 101 b1501, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium;4. Department of Orthopedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Pellenberg, Weligerveld 1, 3212 Pellenberg, Belgium;5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AZ Herentals Hospital, Nederrij 133, 2200 Herentals, Belgium
Abstract:BackgroundPrevious research showed that standing on textured surfaces can improve postural control by adapting somatosensory inputs from the plantar foot. The additional stimulation of plantar cutaneous mechanoreceptors by a textured surface during single-leg stance on a balance board may increase afferent information to the central nervous system to accelerate muscular responses and to enhance their accuracy. The additional impact of textured surface during single-leg stance on a balance board on postural control and muscle activity is unknown.Research questionTo investigate the differences of a) postural control during single-leg stance on a textured balance board compared to a smooth balance board and b) activity of lower extremity muscles during single-leg stance on a textured balance board compared to a smooth balance board and the floor.MethodsTwenty-six healthy adults (12 females, 14 males; mean age = 25.4 years) were asked to balance on their randomly assigned left or right leg on a force plate (floor; stable condition), a textured balance board and a smooth balance board (unstable conditions). Center of pressure (CoP) displacements (force plate, Bertec, 1000 Hz) and electromyographic activity (EMG) of eight leg muscles were measured and compared between conditions, respectively.ResultsNeither CoP-displacements, nor EMG activities differed significantly between the textured and the smooth balance board (p > 0.05). Significantly higher muscle activities (p < 0.05) were observed using the balance boards compared to the floor.SignificanceSingle-leg stance using a textured balance board seems not to lead to reduced CoP-displacements compared to a smooth balance board. Muscle activation is significantly increased in both balance board conditions compared to the floor, however, it is not different when both balance board surfaces are compared. It could not be recommended to use a textured balance board for altering muscle activity and improving postural control during single-leg stance in favor of a smooth textured balance board.
Keywords:Foot sole  Feedback  Postural control  Muscle activation  Textured surface
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号