Non-pharmacologic approach to pediatric constipation |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH, USA;2. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA, USA;3. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA;4. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Goryeb Children’s Hospital/ Atlantic Health System, Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, NJ, USA;5. Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, NY, USA;6. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, OR, USA;7. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA;8. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Functional constipation (FC) is a pervasive problem in pediatrics. Although pharmaceuticals are commonly used for FC, parents and patients show reluctance or find dissatisfaction with available medications at times. Further, patients often have interest in utilizing nutraceutical supplements and botanicals that are available over the counter. This literature review aims to summarize research studies performed on non-pharmacologic approaches to constipation and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these modalities. Overall data on non-pharmacologic treatments for childhood constipation were sparse, and though some studies were available for adult populations, pediatrics studies were generally limited, lacking or flawed. Certain supplements, such as prebiotics, probiotics and fiber, are safe and are without significant side effects. Though fiber supplements such as glucomannan, green banana mass, cocao husk and various fiber blends have emerging evidence in children, evidence for psyllium, cellulose and flaxseed only have supportive studies in adults. Other than senna, studies of botanicals indicate significant safety concerns (in particular with Aloe vera with aloin and Cascara sagrada) and insufficient evidence. For patients with a significant behavioral or anxiety component to their FC and exhibit dyssynergia, mind-body interventions (e.g. diaphragmatic breathing, biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and behavioral modifications) are certainly safe and effective. Finally, movement and manipulative interventions such as abdominal massage, reflexology, acupuncture and transcutaneous nerve stimulation show promise in the field of pediatric constipation, and data is accumulating for efficacy. These modalities require further study to determine mechanisms of action and which populations may benefit the most from these therapies. |
| |
Keywords: | Functional constipation Treatment Integrative medicine Fiber |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|