首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

6项临床化学指标适用血浆样本类型的研究
引用本文:赵立飞,;解传芬,;黄宪章. 6项临床化学指标适用血浆样本类型的研究[J]. 陕西医学检验, 2014, 0(3): 115-117
作者姓名:赵立飞,  解传芬,  黄宪章
作者单位:[1]深圳迈瑞生物医疗电子股份有限公司生化与免疫产品开发部,广东深圳518057; [2]广东省中医院检验科,广州510120
摘    要:目的 研究不饱和铁结合力(UIBC)、β-羟丁酸(β-HB)、肌红蛋白(MYO)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、铁(Fe)和磷(P)试剂盒可接受的血浆样本类型.方法 使用血清、肝素血浆和EDTA血浆采血管,收集研究对象静脉血样本.样本离心处理后,在BS-800全自动生化分析仪上,分别检测血清和血浆样本中UIBC,β HB,MYO,ALT,Fe和P的水平,并对血清和血浆样本结果进行统计学分析.结果 血清样本组UIBC,β HB,MYO测定结果(34.4±9.8 μmol/L,0.41±0.92mmol/L和48.0±21.6 ng/ml)与肝素血浆样本组(34.6±10.2 μmol/L,0.41±0.92 mmol/L和46.7±20.1 ng/ml)比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.77, 0.88和1.33,P均>0.05),血清样本组MYO测定结果(113.2±118.0 ng/ml)和EDTA血浆样本组(113.0±116.3 ng/ml)比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.25,P>0.05).血清样本组ALT,Fe和P测定结果(76.9±155.7 U/L,17.7±16.3 μmol/L和1.14±0.15 mmol/L)与肝素血浆样本组(76.3±155.8 U/L,17.9±16.3 μmol/L和1.11±0.15 mmol/L)比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.99,-2.25和5.61,P均<0.05),血清样本组P测定结果(1.14±0.15mmol/L)和EDTA血浆样本组(1.09±0.14 mmol/L)比较差异有统计学意义(t=13.46,P<0.05).但血清和肝素血浆ALT,Fe和P测定结果,及血清和EDTA血浆P测定结果均呈正相关(相关系数分别为0.999 9,0.999 0,0.987 5和0.9936,P均<0.01),在医学决定水平处的偏差(4.2%-3.2%)均小于允许误差的50%.结论 肝素血浆样本类型适用于UIBC,β HB,MYO,ALT,Fe和P试剂盒的测定,EDTA血浆样本类型适用于MYO和P的测定.

关 键 词:血清  血浆  样本类型  兼容性

Study on the Appropriate Plasma Sample Types of Six Clinical Chemistry Indexes
Affiliation:ZHAO Li-fei,XIE Chuan-fen,HUANG Xian-zhang( 1.Clinical Chemistry and Immunoassay Product Development Division, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Guangdong Shenzhen 518057, China; 2.Department of Clinical Laboratory, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China)
Abstract:Objective To study the acceptable plasma sample types of UIBC,β HB,MYO,ALT,Fe and P kits.Methods Col lected venous blood samples from objects,using serum,heparin plasma and EDTA plasma tubes,and measured the level of UIBC,β HB,MYO,ALT,Fe and P in the centrifuged serum and plasma samples on the BS-800 automatic biochemistry ana lyzer.Last performed statistical analysis between the serum and plasma groups.Results For UIBC,β HB and MYO,the re sult difference between the serum (34.4± 9.8 μmol/L,0.41 ± 0.92 mmol/L and 48.0 ± 21.6 ng/ml) and heparin plasma groups (34.6 ± 10.2 μmol/L,0.41 ± 0.92 mmol/L and 46.7 ± 20.1 ng/ml) was not statistically significant (t=0.77,0.88 and 1.33,P>0.05).For MYO,the result difference between the serum (113.2 ± 118.0 ng/ml) and EDTA plasma groups (113.0 ± 116.3 ng/ml) was not statistically significant (t=0.25,P> 0.05).For ALT,Fe and P,the result difference between the serum (76.9 ± 155.7 U/L,17.7 ± 16.3 μmol/L,1.14 ± 0.15 mmol/L) and heparin plasma groups (76.3 ± 155.8 U/L,17.9±16.3 μmol/L,1.11±0.15 mmol/L) was statistically significant (t=2.99,2.25 and 5.61,P<0.05).For P,the result difference between the serum (1.14±0.15 mmol/L) and heparin plasma groups (1.09±0.14 mmol/L) was statistically significant (t=13.46,P<0.05).However,the results of serum ALT,Fe and P were positively correlated with heparin plasma groups,the results of serum P were positively correlated with EDTA plasma groups (the four correla tioncoefficients were0.999 9,0.999 0,0.987 5 and0.993 6,respectively,P<0.01),and the biases (4.2%-3.2%) at the medical decision levels were less than 50 percent of the allowable error.Conclusion Heparin plasma type can be used for the tests of UIBC,β HB,MYO,ALT,Fe,and P kits,and EDTA plasma type can be used for the tests of MYO and P kits.
Keywords:serum  plasma  sample type  compatibility
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号