首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison among four commonly used demineralizing agents for root conditioning: a scanning electron microscopy
Authors:Amaral Nathalia Godoy do  Rezende Maria Lúcia Rubo de  Hirata Fabiana  Rodrigues Marcus Gustavo Silva  Sant'ana Adriana Campos Passanezi  Greghi Sebastião Luiz Aguiar  Passanezi Euloir
Affiliation:Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of S?o Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:Dental roots that have been exposed to the oral cavity and periodontal pocketenvironment present superficial changes, which can prevent connective tissuereattachment. Demineralizing agents have been used as an adjunct to the periodontaltreatment aiming at restoring the biocompatibility of roots.

Objective

This study compared four commonly used demineralizing agents for their capacity ofremoving smear layer and opening dentin tubules.

Methods

Fifty fragments of human dental roots previously exposed to periodontal diseasewere scaled and randomly divided into the following groups of treatment: 1) CA:demineralization with citric acid for 3 min; 2) TC-HCl: demineralization withtetracycline-HCl for 3 min; 3) EDTA: demineralization with EDTA for 3 min; 4) PA:demineralization with 37% phosphoric acid for 3 min; 5)Control: rubbing of salinesolution for 3 min. Scanning electron microscopy was used to check for thepresence of residual smear layer and for measuring the number and area of exposeddentin tubules.

Results

Smear layer was present in 100% of the specimens from the groups PA and control;in 80% from EDTA group; in 33.3% from TC-HCl group and 0% from CA group. The meannumbers of exposed dentin tubules in a standardized area were: TC-HCl=43.8±25.2;CA=39.3±37; PA=12.1±16.3; EDTA=4.4±7.5 and Control=2.3±5.7. The comparison showedsignificant differences between the following pairs of groups: TC-HCl and Control;TC-HCl and EDTA; CA and Control; and CA and EDTA. The mean percentages of areaoccupied by exposed dentin tubules were: CA=0.12±0.17%; TC-HCl=0.08±0.06%;PA=0.03±0.05%; EDTA=0.01±0.01% and Control=0±0%. The CA group differedsignificantly from the others except for the TC-HCl group.

Conclusion

There was a decreasing ability for smear layer removal and dentin tubule wideningas follows: AC>TC-HCl>PA>EDTA. This information can be of value as anextra parameter for choosing one of them for root conditioning.
Keywords:Demineralization   Root scaling   Smear layer   Scanning electron microscopy
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号