首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

门静脉高压症不同术式对门静脉系统血流动力学的影响
引用本文:熊炳贤,刘大仁,李红浪,曾飞,孙晋友,王梦龙,谢敏.门静脉高压症不同术式对门静脉系统血流动力学的影响[J].江西医学院学报,2007,47(1):11-13.
作者姓名:熊炳贤  刘大仁  李红浪  曾飞  孙晋友  王梦龙  谢敏
作者单位:[1]南昌大学第二附属医院普外科,南昌330006 [2]南昌大学医学院学报编辑部,南昌330006
基金项目:江西省科技厅科技攻关项目
摘    要:目的 评价脾肾分流术(SRS)、贲门周围血管离断术(PCDV)及SRS PCDV术对门静脉系统血流动力学的影响. 方法 43例患者随机分为SRS组(11例)、PCDV组(20例)和SRS PCDV组(12例).手术前后运用彩色多普勒检测门静脉血流量(PVF)及术中动态测量自由门静脉压(FPP). 结果 分流组术后PVF及FPP与术前差异有显著性(P<0.01).断流组术后PVF减少,差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),FPP降低有显著性(P<0.05).SRS PCDV组术后PVF减少和FPP降低差异有显著性(P<0.05).3组间PVF和FPP差异有显著性(P<0.05). 结论 分流 断流联合术(SRS PCDV)即能有效地降低门静脉压力,又能维持门静脉血流向肝灌注,是治疗门静脉高压症合理的术式.

关 键 词:门脉高压  血流动力学  分流术  断流术  门静脉高压症  不同术式  门静脉系统  血流动力学  影响  Hypertension  Patients  Portal  Surgical  Procedures  治疗  肝灌注  流向  门静脉血流量  门静脉压力  联合术  意义  差异  术后  结果  自由门静脉压
文章编号:23976394
修稿时间:11 23 2006 12:00AM

Effects of Various Surgical Procedures on Portal Hemodynamice in Patients with Potal Hypertension
XIONG Bin-xian,LIU Da-ren,LI Hong-lang,ZEN Fei,SUN Jin-you,WANG Meng-long,XIE Min.Effects of Various Surgical Procedures on Portal Hemodynamice in Patients with Potal Hypertension[J].Acta Academiae Medicinae Jiangxi,2007,47(1):11-13.
Authors:XIONG Bin-xian  LIU Da-ren  LI Hong-lang  ZEN Fei  SUN Jin-you  WANG Meng-long  XIE Min
Institution:a. Department of General Surgery,Second Affiliated Hospital ; b. Department of Journal Editor,Medital College ; Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of splenorenal vein shunt(SRS), peripheral cardiac divided vessel(PCDV)and SRS+PCDV on hemodynamics of portal venous system.Methods Forty-three patients were randomly divided into three groups: SRS group (11 cases), PCDV group (20 cases),and SRS+PCDV group (12 cases). The portal venous flow (PVF) and free portal pressure(FPP)were measured by Doppler color ultrasound before and after operation, during operation.Results In SRS group the postoperative compared to preopative PVF and FPP decreased (P<0.01). In PCDV group PVF decreased(P>0.05), there was not significant difference Fpp decreased (P<0.05). In SRS+PCDV group PVF and FPP decreased by respectively(P<0.05). PVF and FPP among groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion SRS+PCDV procedure decreased the portal hypertension meanwhile, it also maintains liver perfusion. It is reasonable in the treatment of portal hypertension.
Keywords:portal hypertension  hemodynamice  shunt  amputation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号