Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery |
| |
Authors: | Ganesh Sankaranarayanan Rajeswara R. Resapu Daniel B. Jones Steven Schwaitzberg Suvranu De |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. JEC 2049, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, Center for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8th Street, Troy, NY, 12180, USA 2. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA 3. Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA 4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
|
| |
Abstract: | Background Instruments that apply energy to cut, coagulate, and dissect tissue with minimal bleeding facilitate surgery. The improper use of energy devices may increase patient morbidity and mortality. The current article reviews various energy sources in terms of their common uses and safe practices. Methods For the purpose of this review, a general search was conducted through NCBI, SpringerLink, and Google. Articles describing laparoscopic or minimally invasive surgeries using single or multiple energy sources are considered, as are articles comparing various commercial energy devices in laboratory settings. Keywords, such as laparoscopy, energy, laser, electrosurgery, monopolar, bipolar, harmonic, ultrasonic, cryosurgery, argon beam, laser, complications, and death were used in the search. Results A review of the literature shows that the performance of the energy devices depends upon the type of procedure. There is no consensus as to which device is optimal for a given procedure. The technical skill level of the surgeon and the knowledge about the devices are both important factors in deciding safe outcomes. Conclusions As new energy devices enter the market increases, surgeons should be aware of their indicated use in laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open surgery. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|