首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Influence of age in estimating maximal oxygen uptake
Affiliation:Heart Institute Edson Saad and Medical School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Exercise Medicine Clinic, CLINIMEX, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil;Preventive Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation , William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, United States;Section of Geriatric Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Geriatrics, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA;Heart Institute Edson Saad and Medical School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil: Exercise Medicine Clinic, CLINIMEX, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Abstract:Objective To assess the influence of age on the error of estimate (EE) of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) using sex and population specific-equations in cycle ergometer exercise testing, since estimated VO2max is associated with a substantial EE, often exceeding 20%, possibly due to intrinsic variability of mechanical efficiency. Methods 1850 adults (68% men), aged 18 to 91 years, underwent maximal cycle ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was assessed relative to sex and age [younger (18 to 35 years), middle-aged (36 to 60 years) and older (> 60 years)]. VO2max [mL?(kg?min)?1] was directly measured by assessment of gas exchange and estimated using sex and population specific-equations. Measured and estimated values of VO2max and related EE were compared among the three age- and sex-specific groups. Results Directly measured VO2max of men and women were 29.5 ± 10.5 mL?(kg?min)?1 and 24.2 ± 9.0 mL?(kg?min)?1 (P < 0.01). EE [mL?(kg?min)?1] and percent errors (%E) for men and women had similar values, 0.5 ± 3.2 and 0.4 ± 2.9 mL?(kg?min)?1, and ?0.8 ± 13.1% and ?1.7 ± 15.4% (P > 0.05), respectively. EE and %E for each age-group were, respectively, for men: younger = 1.9 ± 4.1 mL?(kg?min)?1 and 3.8 ± 10.5%, middle-aged = 0.6 ± 3.1 mL?(kg?min)?1 and 0.4 ± 10.3%, older = ?0.2 ± 2.7 mL?(kg?min) ?1 and ?4.2 ± 16.6% (P < 0.01); and for women: younger = 1.2 ± 3.1 mL?(kg?min) ?1 and 2.7 ± 10.0%, middle-aged = 0.7 ± 2.8 mL?(kg?min)?1 and 0.5 ± 11.1%, older = -0.8 ± 2.3 mL?(kg?min)?1 and ?9.5 ± 22.4% (P < 0.01). Conclusion VO2max were underestimated in younger age-groups and were overestimated in older age groups. Age significantly influences the magnitude of the EE of VO2max in both men and women and should be considered when CRF is estimated using population specific equations, rather than directly measured.
Keywords:Aging   Cardiopulmonary exercise testing   Error of measurement
点击此处可从《老年心脏病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《老年心脏病学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号