| 系统评价和meta分析质量的评价方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张俊华,商洪才,张伯礼. 系统评价和meta分析质量的评价方法[J]. 中西医结合学报, 2008, 6(4): 337-340 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张俊华 商洪才 张伯礼 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 天津中医药大学循证医学中心,天津300193;天津中医药大学中医药研究院,天津300193
2. 天津中医药大学中医药研究院,天津,300193 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家科技攻关计划 , 国家自然科学基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 循证医学提倡任何健康相关决策的制订均需可靠证据的支持。系统评价是高质量证据的来源,能为临床医生、患者及其他决策者提供重要信息，但如果评价员没有很好地掌握系统评价的方法,特别是meta分析使用不当，会产生存在偏倚的、甚至不正确的结论，误导临床决策。因此，了解评价系统评价和meta分析质量的方法，有利于更好地使用系统评价研究的信息而不致盲从。
|
| 关 键 词： | 系统评价 meta分析 质量评价 卫生保健 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-1977(2008)04-0337-04 |
How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis |
| |
| Jun-hua ZHANG,Hong-cai SHANG,Bo-li ZHANG. How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Chinese integrative medicine, 2008, 6(4): 337-340 |
| |
| Authors: | Jun-hua ZHANG Hong-cai SHANG Bo-li ZHANG |
| |
| Affiliation: | Jun-hua ZHANG, Hong-cai SHANG, Bo-li ZHANG( 1. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China 2. Research Center of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Evidence-based medicine advocates that decision making should be based on the adequate evidence. High quality systematic review is an important source of information for clinicians, patients, governments and other decision makers in decision making. If reviewers couldn't master the correct method of systematic review or meta-analysis was misused, the inaccurate, biased or misleading outcomes would be produced. So understanding of the methods of evaluating the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis is helpful to make good use of the review's information. |
| |
| Keywords: | systematic review meta analysis quatity assessment, health care |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
