Relationship of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data to echocardiographic findings in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND: The present study was performed to assess the value of ambulatoryblood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in determining the adequacyof blood pressure (BP) control, and its relationship to echocardiographicfindings in haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We studied 40 non-diabetic adult patients who had been on regularHD treatment for a median duration of 43 months. Twenty-four-hourABPM was performed using a non-invasive ABP monitor (Pressurescan,ERKA). Casual BP (cBP) was defined as the average of two measurementsobtained at two HD sessions, one preceding and one followingthe ABP recordings, and was calculated for both the predialysisand postdialysis phases. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiographywere performed in each patient to determine interventricularseptal thickness (IVS), left ventricular posterior wall thickness(LVPW), left ventricular fractional shortening (FS), and leftventricular mass index (LVMI) RESULTS: According to average 24-h BP levels, 50% of the patients hadsystolic hypertension (HT) (>139 mmHg), and 72.5% had diastolicHT (>87 mmHg), while only 25% had been diagnosed as HT bycBP measurements (P>0.01 and P>0.0001 respectively). Diurnalvariation in BP was not present in about 80% of the patients.Echocardiography was normal in only four patients (10%). LVMIand LV wall thickness were correlated to ABPM data better thanto cBP measurements. Using stepwise linear regression analysis,LVMI and FVS were positively correlated with systolic BP load(P> 0.0001 and P=0.0001 respectively), and LVPW was positivelycorrelated with night-time systolic BP level (P>0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ABPM is necessary to assess the adequacy of BP control, andis well correlated to end-organ damage of HT in HD patients.