Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Clinical Research & Public Health Sciences Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America;2. Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America;3. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States of America;4. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America;5. University of California San Francisco Medical Library, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America;6. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America;7. Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveMaking an informed decision about colorectal cancer screening requires health literacy. Our aim was to develop and pilot-test a computer-based decision aid to support informed decision making about whether or not to participate in colorectal cancer screening for individuals with varying health literacy levels in the Netherlands.MethodsFirst, we designed and adapted the decision aid prototype among 25 individuals with low (n = 15) and adequate (n = 10) health literacy. Second, we used a before/after study to assess changes in knowledge, attitude, intention, decisional conflict, deliberation, anxiety and risk perception in an online survey among 81 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening with low (n = 35) and adequate (n = 46) health literacy.ResultsThe decision aid was acceptable, comprehensible, reduced decisional conflict, increased deliberation and improved knowledge about colorectal cancer screening, but not about colorectal cancer, among individuals with adequate and low health literacy. Usability was slightly higher for participants with adequate health literacy compared to those with low health literacy.ConclusionThe decision aid is promising in supporting informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening, also among individuals with lower health literacy.Practice implicationsFurther refinement of interactive features, such as videos, animations and the values clarification exercise, is needed to increase the usability of the decision aid. |
| |
Keywords: | Decision aid Colorectal cancer screening Health literacy Informed decision making Computer-based |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|